Ok so to mitigate the spanning tree issue we implemented Layer 3 till Access
layer which means the uplink from Access to Distribution is a layer 3 link
now. But the link between the 2 Access switches (SA01 and SA02) is a trunk
link.
On 17 June 2010 18:12, Jack Router <pan.router_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> Not sure what you mean by Layer 3 on the access switch. Do you route on
> access switches or on core switches? When you want the same vlans on
> multiple access switches you do not configure L3 on them but configure VLAN
> trunking.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody_at_groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> naman sharma
> Sent: 17-Jun-10 19:41
> To: Cisco certification
> Subject: HSRP in this design
>
> Hi,
>
> We plan to roll out a new design and in this design we plan to push the
> Layer 3 to the access layer. Now my question is that Vlan's span at this
> point to multiple locations.
>
> So when we would be configuring Layer 3 on Access Layer same vlan will be
> on
> Multiple Access switch. Now as the users are getting the I.P Address
> through
> DHCP so we plan to implement HSRP so that DHCP Scope can provide same
> Default Gateway but this is not a clean design as this can lead to longer
> path for eg User at SA01 gets a Default gateway and the Primary router for
> that User Vlan is SA02 and hence the traffic flows to SA01 and then SA02
> and
> then goes out.
>
> Is there any other clean solution.
>
> thanks
> naman
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Thu Jun 17 2010 - 18:28:11 ART
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Aug 01 2010 - 09:11:37 ART