Re: Passive or neigbour command

From: <Charles.Henson_at_regions.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2010 14:10:08 -0500

In what context? Passive interface on a routing protocol? Neighbor
statements to use unicast instead of multicast for peering?

Charles Henson

|------------>
| From: |
|------------>
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
  |kennypual <pdaramol_at_gmail.com> |
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|------------>
| To: |
|------------>
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
  |ccielab_at_groupstudy.com |
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|------------>
| Date: |
|------------>
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
  |06/17/2010 01:59 PM |
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|------------>
| Subject: |
|------------>
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
  |Passive or neigbour command |
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

Can someone help me with explanation of the two? What situations will you
use one or not use another.

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Thu Jun 17 2010 - 14:10:08 ART

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Aug 01 2010 - 09:11:37 ART