Re: SYSLOG

From: sundeep sadhwani <sundeep.sadhwani_at_gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2010 15:36:31 +0530

  Hi

          Thanks very much for replying. However when i used logging
buffered command without using loggin on, the messages were still buffered.
For Eg. If a Question says that you need to logging to buffer then do we
need to enable loggin on or logging buffered will do???? I have tried this
and found that even without using logging on the messages were getting
buffered.

Regards
Sundeep Sadhwani

On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 1:08 PM, eseosa <eseosa.ehiwe_at_gmail.com> wrote:

> Yes , you need to use logging on command to enable logging to either
> console , buffer or a syslog server .
>
>
>
> On 5/26/10, sundeep.sadhwani_at_gmail.com <sundeep.sadhwani_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > I often get confused when using logging command. For Example:
> Suppose
> > you
> > want to send syslog messages to a server, Then do we need to use the
> > logging
> > on command ?? As logging on will enable logging to all i.e.; on vty lines
> ,
> > memory. But still i have seen examples where they use logging on prior to
> > sending syslog messages.
> >
> > Regards
> > Sundeep
> >
> >
> > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Warm Regards,
>
> Eseosa
> CCIE #23782
> Before God we are all equally wise - and equally foolish.
> Albert Einstein

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Wed Jun 02 2010 - 15:36:31 ART

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Aug 01 2010 - 09:11:36 ART