Re: ipv6 rip question

Hi Adrian

Actually after doing a few more labs I have noticed that we can have more
than one rip instances at the same time.I saw that via show ipv6 rip
database .Now it is much more clear for me.

Thanks again.

On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 5:15 PM, Adrian Brayton <abrayton_at_gmail.com> wrote:

> Are you referring to ipv4 and ipv6? Have you done a sh ipv6 route rip?
>
>
> On May 30, 2010, at 8:56 AM, Joe Astorino wrote:
>
> > I'm not sure I follow your question at this point. If you define the
> RIP-NG process with one name, and then call another name on the interface
> level, you are defining a second process when you fat finger it.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Joe Astorino, CCIE #24347
> >
> > "He not busy being born is busy dying" -- Dylan
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Mustafa Yadav" <mustafa.yadav_at_gmail.com>
> > To: "Joe Astorino" <joe_astorino_at_comcast.net>
> > Cc: "Sinan Bayraktar" <sinan.bayraktar_at_gmail.com>, "Cisco certification"
> <ccielab_at_groupstudy.com>
> > Sent: Sunday, May 30, 2010 8:43:15 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
> > Subject: Re: ipv6 rip question
> >
> > But having unique process id is not so important for having rip run .Even
> if I made a typo for the rip process name it still works.Is not it?
> >
> >
> > On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 3:39 PM, Joe Astorino < joe_astorino_at_comcast.net> wrote:
> >
> >
> > You use the process name to identify the RIP process. You will call that
> same name when you enable RIP on your interfaces.
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> > Joe Astorino, CCIE #24347
> >
> > "He not busy being born is busy dying" -- Dylan
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> >
> >
> >
> > From: "Sinan Bayraktar" < sinan.bayraktar_at_gmail.com >
> > To: "Cisco certification" < ccielab_at_groupstudy.com >
> > Sent: Sunday, May 30, 2010 8:19:27 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
> > Subject: ipv6 rip question
> >
> > hi,
> >
> > I did not understand why we are using a process name for for ipv6 rip
> > process.Even I use rip process name I can see rip routes in the routing
> > table.What is the point here?In which situation having unique process
> name
> > makes sense?
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> >
> > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
> >
> > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
> >
> > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Sun May 30 2010 - 18:29:57 ART