Re: unable to reach VPN sites behind TE tunnel?

JR,

If you terminate your tunnel at the PE, i.e between R5 and R9 then your
configuration should work.
Two labels in your stack in that case.

But since you are terminating the tunnel on the P router, then an additional
label is required for the tunnel.
Three labels in this scenario.

Enabling ldp on the tunnel interfaces will form a targetted ldp relationship
with the routers "automatically" !

Best Regards,
Tharak Abraham Luke

On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 9:00 AM, JR Garcia <ttuner_at_gmail.com> wrote:

> topology:
>
> R5------R6-----R8------R9
>
> - TE tunnel between R5 and R8 (tunnel is up)
> - R5 and R9 are vpnv4 neighbors
>
> i see the routes in the vrf routing table on both sides, but cant ping.
> i remove the tunnel and just let the LSP set up over LDP and all is
> well. what am i missing?
>
> tunnel configs:
>
> interface Tunnel1
> ip unnumbered Loopback0
> tunnel destination 192.168.8.8
> tunnel mode mpls traffic-eng
> tunnel mpls traffic-eng autoroute announce
> tunnel mpls traffic-eng path-option 1 explicit name R8
>
>
> interface Tunnel0
> ip unnumbered Loopback0
> tunnel destination 192.168.5.5
> tunnel mode mpls traffic-eng
> tunnel mpls traffic-eng autoroute announce
> tunnel mpls traffic-eng path-option 1 explicit name R5
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Sat May 29 2010 - 16:13:51 ART