Re: OSPF cost through MPLS VPN

From: Carlos G Mendioroz <tron_at_huapi.ba.ar>
Date: Mon, 24 May 2010 08:48:55 -0300

Hmmm, I guess you wrote it backwards.
For those that do not have english as the mother tongue, attention to
details seems to be even more important:

Prakash Kalsaria @ 24/05/2010 0:47 -0300 dixit:
> if the backdoor link cost is same as the MPLS VPN backbone
> It Will choose intra-area routes even after manipulating the cost

Cost is not relevant when comparing inter area to intra area.

>
> other option which i tried during labbing was change the cost of backdoor
> link on physical interface
>
> Using a Sham link: you backdoor link cost should be less than the MPLS VPN
> backbone to choose backbone for traffic

Backdoor cost should be *more* than the backbone to choose the backbone.

-Carlos
>
> prakash kalsaria
> http://prakashkalsaria.wordpress.com
>
>
> On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 4:27 AM, Carlos G Mendioroz <tron_at_huapi.ba.ar>wrote:
>
>> ... which is the reason for sham links to begin with!
>>
>> I guess you might call it a non area 0 virtual link.
>>
>> -Carlos
>>
>> Adrian Brayton @ 23/05/2010 19:03 -0300 dixit:
>>> I would like to add to Joe's response... No matter what you do with cost
>> or manipulation of metrics, OSPF will always choose intra-area route's over
>> inter-area routes.
>>>
>>> On May 23, 2010, at 5:46 PM, Joe Astorino wrote:
>>>
>>>> Yes, you could do a sham-link and set the cost on the sham-link when you
>> configure it. You could also set the OSPF cost during redistribution from
>> BGP --> OSPF.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Joe Astorino, CCIE #24347
>>>>
>>>> "He not busy being born is busy dying" -- Dylan
>>>>
>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>> From: "Hussam EL Kebbi" <hussamkibbi_at_hotmail.com>
>>>> To: ccielab_at_groupstudy.com
>>>> Sent: Sunday, May 23, 2010 5:39:07 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
>>>> Subject: OSPF cost through MPLS VPN
>>>>
>>>> Hi Experts,
>>>> What are the ways to change OSPF cost through mplsvpn (between PEs)I
>> guess
>>>> sham link is one way?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>> _________________________________________________________________
>>>> The New Busy think 9 to 5 is a cute idea. Combine multiple calendars
>> with
>>>> Hotmail.
>>>>
>> http://www.windowslive.com/campaign/thenewbusy?tile=multicalendar&ocid=PID283
>>>> 26::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:WM_HMP:042010_5
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________________________________
>>>> Subscription information may be found at:
>>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________________________________
>>>> Subscription information may be found at:
>>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>>
>>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________________________________
>>> Subscription information may be found at:
>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> --
>> Carlos G Mendioroz <tron_at_huapi.ba.ar> LW7 EQI Argentina
>>
>>
>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

-- 
Carlos G Mendioroz  <tron_at_huapi.ba.ar>  LW7 EQI  Argentina
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Mon May 24 2010 - 08:48:55 ART

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue Jun 01 2010 - 07:09:53 ART