Re: End of IPv4 !!

a lot of applications will be re-written for IPV6 as well. I belive we won't
see pure end to end IPV6 till we retire!!

On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 1:06 AM, Kambiz Agahian <kagahian_at_ccbootcamp.com>wrote:

> Moazam,
>
> When I was a school boy they told us "Sky's falling! Only 4%
> remaining!", when I left the school they shouted at us saying "Danger!
> Only 4% remaining!", when I worked for the vendor I was told that only
> 4% was remaining, and when I got my CCIE they asked us to learn IPv6
> because only 4% of IPv4 space was still available. Today I'm hearing the
> same thing. This sky has been coming down for more than 20 years and
> except some US based SP's no one is 100% ready for IPv6, so I don't
> listen to this kind of rumor anymore :) - they scream today and release
> a couple of big /8 blocks tomorrow; don't take them serious; let them
> play with their counters.
>
>
> --------------------------
> Kambiz Agahian
> CCIE (R&S), CCSI, WAASSE, RSSSE
> Technical Instructor
> CCBOOTCAMP - Cisco Learning Solutions Partner (CLSP)
> Email: kagahian_at_ccbootcamp.com
> Toll Free: 877-654-2243
> International: +1-702-968-5100
> Skype: skype:ccbootcamp?call
> FAX: +1-702-446-8012
> YES! We take Cisco Learning Credits!
> Training And Remote Racks: http://www.ccbootcamp.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody_at_groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> William McCall
> Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2010 9:30 AM
> To: Syed Moazzam Daimi
> Cc: ccielab_at_groupstudy.com
> Subject: Re: End of IPv4 !!
>
> You may be right that exhaustion of v4 public IP space is eminent, but
> v4 has a hell of a long way to go before its dead.
>
> You should probably check out NANOG and the IETF mailing lists about
> the various operational and (from a vendor standpoint) implementation
> issues and modifications.
>
> Even thought the government is requiring v6 support for equipment,
> they have not been implementing it. (I remember another case where the
> government thought IP would be dead.. CLNS...and we know what happened
> with that)
>
> --
> William McCall, CCIE #25044
>
> On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 9:15 AM, Syed Moazzam Daimi
> <daimi.moazzam_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi Fellas,
> >
> > Its been a while since I hear that IPv4 is going off soon, back in the
> days
> > when I started with IP addressing and Subnetting it was the first
> thing I
> > read. I know NAT has brought us this far and I wonder till what time
> we will
> > be using IPv4.
> >
> > I've heard China has largest setup of IPv6 setup, Federal department
> in US
> > has started using it since 2005, and India is working on many
> deployment
> > projects of IPv6.
> >
> > Personally I feel that Cisco world is not ready for IPv6 yet
> completely, as
> > things are not designed the way those are for IPv4, making IPv6
> depending on
> > IPv4. When I was working on IPv6 for my CCIE and worked very hard on
> it, but
> > never used it after lab and now I have to open Cisco document if I am
> > discussing on IPv6.
> > Having said this, what you guys think about IPv6 and Cisco IPv6
> future, I
> > know its gonna be there but when do you think we'll be fully indulged
> into
> > it ?
> >
> > --
> > Regards,
> > Syed Moazzam Daimi
> > CCIE # 22100
> >
> >
> > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Fri May 21 2010 - 01:10:13 ART