Re: End of IPv4 !!

From: William McCall <william.mccall_at_gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 20 May 2010 09:29:56 -0500

You may be right that exhaustion of v4 public IP space is eminent, but
v4 has a hell of a long way to go before its dead.

You should probably check out NANOG and the IETF mailing lists about
the various operational and (from a vendor standpoint) implementation
issues and modifications.

Even thought the government is requiring v6 support for equipment,
they have not been implementing it. (I remember another case where the
government thought IP would be dead.. CLNS...and we know what happened
with that)

-- 
William McCall, CCIE #25044
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 9:15 AM, Syed Moazzam Daimi
<daimi.moazzam_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Fellas,
>
> Its been a while since I hear that IPv4 is going off soon, back in the days
> when I started with IP addressing and Subnetting it was the first thing I
> read. I know NAT has brought us this far and I wonder till what time we will
> be using IPv4.
>
> I've heard China has largest setup of IPv6 setup, Federal department in US
> has started using it since 2005, and India is working on many deployment
> projects of IPv6.
>
> Personally I feel that Cisco world is not ready for IPv6 yet completely, as
> things are not designed the way those are for IPv4, making IPv6 depending on
> IPv4. When I was working on IPv6 for my CCIE and worked very hard on it, but
> never used it after lab and now I have to open Cisco document if I am
> discussing on IPv6.
> Having said this, what you guys think about IPv6  and Cisco IPv6 future, I
> know its gonna be there but when do you think we'll be fully indulged into
> it ?
>
> --
> Regards,
> Syed Moazzam Daimi
> CCIE # 22100
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Thu May 20 2010 - 09:29:56 ART

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue Jun 01 2010 - 07:09:53 ART