Re: OT: Fram-Relay with ML-PPP and (Virtual Template and

Both can be used, they'll do the same thing in ur topolgy.

Virtual-template has some advantages though. It supports dynamic dial
in/out features.

Also Virtual-access interface is dynamically created only when the
link is active thereby saves some resources. This advantage is more
applicable if u have a bigger setup. For a static P2P setup, it really
doesnt make a difference.

Swap
#19804

On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 3:41 PM, Syed Khalid Ali
<khalid_khursheed_at_hotmail.com> wrote:
> Group:
> I was reading through to configure multilink PPP and came across the following
> link:http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/qos/configuration/guide/mlppp_over_f
> r.pdf
> The only advantage with a interface multilink is that different link could be
> bundled.
> I have the following scenario:
> R1---s0/0---frame-relay---s0/0---R2 |-------s0/1----|
> Now what I could think of is associate DLCIs to virtual templates and enable
> multilink PPP on the virtual template interface on R2.
> But the other way around can be to attach the DLCI to virtual templates and
> then associating virtual templates with interface multilink.
> Can any one explain the difference between these two methods. What is
> advantage of one method over the other.ThanksKhalid
>
>
>
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Hotmail: Free, trusted and rich email service.
> https://signup.live.com/signup.aspx?id=60969
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Wed May 19 2010 - 18:52:24 ART