Re: Received Routes

From: Bernard Steven <buny.steven_at_gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 15 May 2010 20:44:14 +0530

Can any one explain the difference between the received-routes vs routes ?
I have also encountered the same situation.

sh ip bgp neighbors x.x.x.x received-routes
% Inbound soft reconfiguration not enabled on 150.1.4.4

On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 8:28 PM, Muzammil Malick <malickmuz_at_gmail.com>wrote:

> Thanks everyone. The received-routes command is now working as expected
> after a reload.
>
> On 15 May 2010 15:44, Fabian Pucciarelli <fabiangp_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > try routes instead of received-routes, I'm not very clear on what's the
> > difference but that may be what you are looking for.
> >
> >
> > On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 10:45 AM, Muzammil Malick <malickmuz_at_gmail.com
> >wrote:
> >
> >> Hi guys,will post soon but am away from the equipment for a few days.
> >>
> >> I have tried hard reset, this did not solve the issue.
> >>
> >> On 7 May 2010 15:05, David Bass <davidbass570_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Can you post your BGP configs on each router and a "sh ip route" from
> >> each
> >> > as well?
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 3:50 AM, Muzammil Malick <malickmuz_at_gmail.com
> >> >wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> Hi Maarten
> >> >>
> >> >> No this is not the case. The routes are being learnt at R2 aswell but
> >> not
> >> >> showing in received-routes at R2. I will update with configs soon but
> >> >> there
> >> >> is nothing in terms of filtering and reachability is not an issue.
> >> >>
> >> >> On 7 May 2010 06:40, Maarten Vervoorn <mr.vervoorn_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> > Hi,
> >> >> >
> >> >> > I think you mean the following. R1 is advertising routes to R2, R1
> >> has
> >> >> it
> >> >> > in its routing table and you can't see them on R2.
> >> >> > There could be serveral things going on. (next hop not reachable ,
> >> >> filter
> >> >> > lists, some other misconfiguration) Can you please share us you
> >> >> > configuration so we can check whats going on.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Regards,
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Maarten
> >> >> >
> >> >> > 2010/5/6 Muzammil Malick <malickmuz_at_gmail.com>
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> Hi
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Has anybody ever come across this situation:
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> R1 is advertising prefixes to R2 via BGP and these prefixes are
> >> >> installed
> >> >> >> in the routing table of R2
> >> >> >> but when viewing the received routes from R1 on R2 there are
> >> >> >> no received routes (soft reconfig inbound is configured!)
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> _______________________________________________________________________
> >> >> >> Subscription information may be found at:
> >> >> >> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >> >>
> >> >>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> >> >> Subscription information may be found at:
> >> >> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >>
> >>
> >> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________________________________
> >> Subscription information may be found at:
> >> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> > Regards,
> >
> > Fabian Pucciarelli
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Sat May 15 2010 - 20:44:14 ART

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue Jun 01 2010 - 07:09:53 ART