AW: R&S OEQ's are GONE!!

Spam detection software, running on the system "groupstudy.com", has
identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
admin_at_groupstudy.com for details.

Content preview: Take it easy. I'm pretty sure the OEQ will also get removed
   from SP and Storage once the troubleshooting section is available there.
  As mentioned 100 times before on this list: If you are ready and well prepared,
   those 4 questions should not be a big deal. [...]

Content analysis details: (5.8 points, 5.0 required)

 pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
 0.8 RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB RBL: SORBS: sender is an abusable web server
                            [193.247.250.31 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net]
 4.0 RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET RBL: Received via a relay in bl.spamcop.net
              [Blocked - see <http://www.spamcop.net/bl.shtml?193.247.250.31>]
 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is freemail (rpf23543[at]gmail.com)
 0.0 DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED No valid author signature, adsp_override is
                            CUSTOM_MED
-0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low
                            trust
                            [209.85.219.214 listed in list.dnswl.org]
-1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
                            [score: 0.0000]
 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid
 1.9 FREEMAIL_REPLY From and body contain different freemails
 0.9 NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED ADSP custom_med hit, and not from a mailing list
Received: from mail-ew0-f214.google.com (mail-ew0-f214.google.com
  [209.85.219.214]) by groupstudy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with
  ESMTP id o47E0idK022851 GroupStudy Mailer; Fri, 7 May 2010 10:00:55
  -0400
Received: by ewy6 with SMTP id 6so379626ewy.32 for
  <ccielab_at_groupstudy.com>; Fri, 07 May 2010 07:00:29 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com;
  s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:references
  :in-reply-to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type
  :content-transfer-encoding:x-mailer:thread-index:content-language;
  bh=8pUzwgVxLNTx8oxSr9Yw2vJzdLXBmO2Bc1BIGpxu3KU=;
  b=WEClqvT/nOISwpnka5b1yUDluRyI8+DkzhEC5FE3kL6dopdc+EGWTJ6uXwPCdHPWa/
  cEZCVQe2jZYZpAJOP48jqoS4UTjbiaCiuZaghDdcVNAZA8q491boYFAh/2icZLGhYbBV
  YPxXHl9YH7MXeKronQ/MGSqhXgYC7+ulxU9wg=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
  h=from:to:references:in-reply-to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version
  :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-mailer:thread-index
  :content-language;
  b=A3e3gnSqEBYI2IdWi3jm7XwSIo1vebA8Q94OpAKSXeWsXPR+vsyPOPiDc67u8fGAiq
  0SxokcmZvuqc0QZ2elP4rLe961C/+NkQWQsXCwJvqzt09QOE4LHqtTSUYwQ+xCEyJQyk
  AMtZsBUQJPBIH4IUTaXzhOiN/ocxZptGRl64o=
Received: by 10.213.0.212 with SMTP id 20mr93816ebc.43.1273240829255;
  Fri, 07 May 2010 07:00:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from RogerBBLAB (gprs31.swisscom-mobile.ch [193.247.250.31])
  by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 13sm1137487ewy.13.2010.05.07.07.00.26
  (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 07 May 2010 07:00:28 -0700
  (PDT)
From: "Roger Pfaeffli" <rpf23543_at_gmail.com>
To: "'Waleed Abdulati'" <waleeda2000_at_gmail.com>,
  <artem.nedoshepa_at_gmail.com>, <ccielab_at_groupstudy.com>
References: <y2kd8481dee1005070621y31be312ex37f17f5f61de73c8_at_mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <y2kd8481dee1005070621y31be312ex37f17f5f61de73c8_at_mail.gmail.com>
Subject: AW: R&S OEQ's are GONE!!
Date: Fri, 7 May 2010 16:00:18 +0200
Message-ID: <004a01caeded$a4182bc0$ec488340$@com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0
Thread-Index: Acrt6Ld7zSPHsFhqSse9lTic3tAZNwABGvew
Content-Language: de-ch
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by groupstudy.com id
  o47E0idK022851

Take it easy. I'm pretty sure the OEQ will also get removed from SP and
Storage once the troubleshooting section is available there. As mentioned
100 times before on this list: If you are ready and well prepared, those 4
questions should not be a big deal.

I fully agree, Cisco has to make big efforts to guarantee the integrity of
the exam and prevent cheaters. I think the troubleshooting part is a very
very good way in that direction and additionally it very "real" networking.

regards

Roger #23543

-----Urspr|ngliche Nachricht-----
Von: nobody_at_groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com] Im Auftrag von
Waleed Abdulati
Gesendet: Freitag, 7. Mai 2010 15:22
An: artem.nedoshepa_at_gmail.com; ccielab_at_groupstudy.com
Betreff: RE: R&S OEQ's are GONE!!

That is stupid. First Cisco announcing core knowledge waiver, and now core
knowledge removal, but only from R&S and Voice? Why have waiver in the first
place then? Was it a joke or a hoax? What about SP Security and Storage?
They need to stop destroying our CCIE. If core knowledge is removed, it
should be removed from everything. Who can we talk with at Cisco to stop?
Everyone on this group should join in and contact. These people are stupid
and do not care about our careers just money.

> It's really interesting, last week cisco had pretty much the same meeting,

> there were only 7 people though. According to them, only 0.3% fail the OEQ

> and at the same time have passed the troubleshooting and config section.

> (Ver 4) .

> Just something to think about.

> On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 3:41 AM, Alexei Monastyrnyi <alexeim73_at_gmail.com
>wrote:

> > OEQ for all tracks but RS and Voice are to stay until those lab exams

> > become of a higher integrity.

> >

> > A.

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Fri May 07 2010 - 16:00:18 ART