100 percent agreed.
On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 11:16 AM, Marko Milivojevic <markom_at_ipexpert.com>wrote:
> On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 17:39, Narbik Kocharians <narbikk_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> > That is true, the end that is in half Duplex mode should get "late
> > collisions" and the end that is in full duplex mode should get "CRC
> checks",
> > whereas, a mismatch in Speed (Which i don't think that could be the
> problem
> > that you are experiencing) should show as "NOTCONNECTED".
>
> Quite right, however, if duplex is not hardcoded, but speed is, it
> would not be negotiated in most cases. Cisco used to default to
> half-duplex in this case. I've seen quite a few issues caused by
> configuring only parts of the speed/duplex pair.
>
> If any of them is set manually, negotiation is disabled. To negotiate
> speed and duplex, both need to be set to auto.
>
> As far as recommendation to hardcode them - that would depend on what
> exactly is connected to the port. Some things don't handle
> negotiation, other things don't handle manual settings (fiber optics
> media converters are especially bad).
>
> --
> Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427
> Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert
>
> YES! We include 400 hours of REAL rack
> time with our Blended Learning Solution!
>
> Mailto: markom_at_ipexpert.com
> Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
> Fax: +1.810.454.0130
> Web: http://www.ipexpert.com/
>
-- Narbik Kocharians CCSI#30832, CCIE# 12410 (R&S, SP, Security) www.MicronicsTraining.com Sr. Technical Instructor YES! We take Cisco Learning Credits! Training And Remote Racks available Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.netReceived on Tue May 04 2010 - 11:32:06 ART
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue Jun 01 2010 - 07:09:52 ART