Take the first octet of the ip address.
128 - 1000 0000
192 - 1100 0000
Your prefix lists asks to match the first two bits exactly. 128.0.0.0/2
That means it will match only 10 in the first octet. 192 (1100 0000) does
not fit the criteria.
On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 6:19 PM, Ladee Geek <ladeegeek_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> for the life of me I cannot determine why the prefix noted above is not
> matching the prefix 192.1.1.0/24.
>
>
> The topology is r3 and r5 as eBGP peers. R5 originating 128, 191, and 192
> routes. R5 with the prefix permit 128.0.0.0/2 ge17 attached to the R3
> neighbor statement. That prefix statement is not permitting the 192 route.
>
>
>
> R3 before the prefix-list
>
>
>
> Network Next Hop Metric LocPrf Weight Path
>
> *> 128.1.1.0/24 10.1.35.5 0 0 35 i
>
> *> 191.1.1.0/24 10.1.35.5 0 0 35 i
>
> *> 192.1.1.0 10.1.35.5 0 0 35 i
>
>
>
> R3 after the prefix-list
>
>
>
> Network Next Hop Metric LocPrf Weight Path
>
> *> 128.1.1.0/24 10.1.35.5 0 0 35 i
>
> *> 191.1.1.0/24 10.1.35.5 0 0 35 i
>
>
>
>
>
> R5 Loopbacks
>
>
>
> Loopback128 128.1.1.5/24
>
> Loopback191 191.1.1.5 /24
>
> Loopback192 192.1.1.5/24
>
>
> --
> r/
> LG
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Sun Apr 25 2010 - 18:50:55 ART
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sat May 01 2010 - 09:49:57 ART