RE: mls qos use policy-map for marking

yes, i think so, thanks
 
> Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 07:12:44 -0300
> From: tron_at_huapi.ba.ar
> To: jastorino_at_ipexpert.com
> CC: apache7220_at_hotmail.com; ccielab_at_groupstudy.com
> Subject: Re: mls qos use policy-map for marking
>
> Or leave DSCP alone (in the intermediate switches) which is default
> if you don't enable mls qos, and can be set even if you do.
> My .02 :)
> -Carlos
>
> Joe Astorino @ 21/04/2010 5:15 -0300 dixit:
> > Well that depends. What is between R2 and R3? Another switch? If
> > there is another switch that has QoS enabled you will need to make
> > sure you have the proper trust setup on all the ports end to end. If
> > R2 and R3 are physically connected with a cable I don't see any
> > problem with R3 seeing the markings.
> >
> > There are PHB (per-hop BEHAVIOR) but that has more to due with
> > queueing and how you decide to handle those DSCP markings.
> >
> > 2010/4/21 Bao Bao Chou <apache7220_at_hotmail.com>:
> >> hi Joe
> >>
> >> just last question,
> >>
> >> if now i put one more router behind r2,
> >>
> >> r1------sw1-------sw2-------r2------r3,
> >>
> >>
> >> can r3 see the marking ef????
> >>
> >> my opinion is not, because classification and marking is Per Hop Base, is
> >> it?
> >>
> >> please help me to confirm it.
> >>
> >>
> >> Thank you so much.
> >>
> >> ________________________________
> >> Hotmail: Trusted email with Microsofts powerful SPAM protection. Sign up
> >> now.
> >
> >
> >
>
> --
> Carlos G Mendioroz <tron_at_huapi.ba.ar> LW7 EQI Argentina
                                               
Received on Wed Apr 21 2010 - 14:16:58 ART