Re: Pearson Lab Review

From: Marko Milivojevic <markom_at_ipexpert.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 19:14:36 +0200

On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 19:08, <Charles.Henson_at_regions.com> wrote:
> Marko,
> B B B B I agree with you. This is the future. I also think Ciscos
> compensation was more than fair. Refund AND a voucher. But when you put all
> your heart and resources into something and you plan a window and sign up
> you want it to work. The compensation softens the blow but I'm sure that
> anyone who has gone thru this would probably tell you they'd rather have
> had the lab up and running and reliable than their money back. That's my
> point. I'm not familiar with the internal politics/logistics of delivering
> this solution. I'm sure the Cisco folks aren't happy about it either.

I agree with that. It was a bad experience, but hey... it happens. I
doubt Cisco did anything intenionally or on purpose. I think there
were simply put too many variables to make it right.

We will see improvement next time, I'm sure...

--
Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427
Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert
YES! We include 400 hours of REAL rack
time with our Blended Learning Solution!
Mailto: markom_at_ipexpert.com
Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
Fax: +1.810.454.0130
Web: http://www.ipexpert.com/
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Mon Apr 19 2010 - 19:14:36 ART

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sat May 01 2010 - 09:49:57 ART