We have had students report things like "you covered all of my questions from
the lab", but this was either an over-exagerration, or they were referring to
the fact that they used the More Information links for the questions and they
learned all of the Core Knowledge content they needed from those.
Any time you see a question or task of INE in your actual exam materials, it
is a complete coincidence. We take the NDA very seriously and we always honor
it. When students send us obvious NDA violation emails, we do not even open
them.
The intent of the Core Knowledge Simulator is for you to identify where you
have weaknesses in your Core Knowledge, and as such, it covers the entire Lab
Exam blueprint. We are also finally working on the new engine again. This
engine will allow you to choose the number of questions you want to receive by
category, and the product will be fully Web-based for iPad/iPods and all other
sexy gadgets.
Good luck with your studies and enjoy your products thoroughly whatever you
should decide on.
Also - here is a recommended reading list I did for GS some time ago which
breaks the texts down by lab topic domain:
http://blog.ine.com/2009/04/17/ccie-rs-core-knowledge-section-bookworm-list/
Warmest Regards,
Anthony J. Sequeira, CCIE #15626
http://www.INE.com
Test your Core Knowledge today!
Q: What zone controls access for packets that are destined for the router
acting as a Zone Based Firewall?
A: The Self Zone
More Info:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/secursw/ps1018/products_tech_note09186
a00808bc994.shtml
On Apr 19, 2010, at 12:06 AM, Ashwin Iyer wrote:
> can some one share their actual lab OEQ experience and the percentage of
> questions covered by INE
> rgds
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Mon Apr 19 2010 - 09:44:56 ART
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sat May 01 2010 - 09:49:57 ART