Re: mpls te difference

Hi Slevin,

Both the tunnel config differs in which path to use to reach the
destination. On first scenario, path is will be explicitly configured. You
need to mention the path using "ip explicit-path" config while the second
one will use dynamic calculation.

Regards,
Nagendra

On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 8:28 AM, slevin kremera <slevin.kremera_at_gmail.com>wrote:

> what is the difference between the two
>
> interface Tunnel 123
> ip unnumbered Loopback0
> tunnel destination XXXX
> tunnel mode mpls traffic-eng
> tunnel mpls traffic-eng autoroute announce
> tunnel mpls traffic-eng priority 7 7
> tunnel mpls traffic-eng bandwidth XXXX
> tunnel mpls traffic-eng path-option 1 explicit name XYZ
> no clns route-cache
>
>
> interface Tunnel 123
> ip unnumbered Loopback0
> tunnel destination XXXX
> tunnel mode mpls traffic-eng
> tunnel mpls traffic-eng autoroute announce
> tunnel mpls traffic-eng priority 7 7
> tunnel mpls traffic-eng bandwidth XXXX
> tunnel mpls traffic-eng path-option 1 dynamic
> tunnel mpls traffic-eng record-route
> no clns route-cache
> end
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Thu Apr 15 2010 - 12:39:31 ART