Yes. Can you answer the question ?
Kambiz Agahian @ 12/04/2010 21:50 -0300 dixit:
> Did you get a chance to read my previous post?
> 
> --------------------------
> Kambiz Agahian
> CCIE (R&S)
> CCSI, WAASSE, RSSSE
> Technical Instructor
> CCBOOTCAMP - Cisco Learning Solutions Partner (CLSP)
> Email: kagahian_at_ccbootcamp.com
> Toll Free: 877-654-2243 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting
> 877-654-2243      end_of_the_skype_highlighting
> International: +1-702-968-5100 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting
> +1-702-968-5100      end_of_the_skype_highlighting
> Skype: skype:ccbootcamp?call
> FAX: +1-702-446-8012
> YES! We take Cisco Learning Credits!
> Training And Remote Racks: http://www.ccbootcamp.com
> OEQ Voice Waiver:
> http://www.ccbootcamp.com/noeqvoice.htmljavascript:SetCmd(cmdSend);
> OEQ R&S Waiver: http://www.ccbootcamp.com/noeqrs.html
> OEQ Commercial: http://www.ccbootcamp.com/noeq.mpg
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Carlos G Mendioroz [mailto:tron_at_huapi.ba.ar]
> Sent: Mon 4/12/2010 4:18 PM
> To: Kambiz Agahian
> Cc: Tharindu Rukshan Bamunuarachchi; ccielab_at_groupstudy.com
> Subject: Re: Multicast Data
> 
> Dear,
> would you please answer straight one question ?
> (So we can discuss some facts and not what we imagine is happening in
> the other people heads ?)
> 
> Topology:
> 
> S -- RS -/- RP -/- RD -- D
> 
> S: source of mcast (say, vlc mcasting a movie)
> RS: router serving S, mcast enabled with sparse
> RP: the RP for the group in question (say group G)
> RD: router serving D, mcast enabled with sparse
> D: the recipient (say, vlc playing the movie)
> 
> No other clients involved.
> Now, T0 (that is , time zero) S starts bcasting the movie.
> At T1, 30 seconds after T0, D starts "playing" the data mcasted to group
> G port X.
> 
> *Question*
> How much time will lapse until D starts viewing video ?
> 
> 1) No time, it will start immediatelly (less than 5 seconds)
> 2) No time, video will not start
> 3) Some 2 1/2 minutes
> 4) None of the above
> 
> 
> -Carlos
> 
> 
> Kambiz Agahian @ 12/04/2010 11:39 -0300 dixit:
>> OOOK!
>>
>> Now I know where your problem is:
>>
>> No timers expire if you have a live Multicast source - why?
>>
>> If your Windows multicast server sends Multicast packets to its segment but
> no
>> receiver is known to the RP, his closest router (say R1) receives a (S,G)
>> Register-stop message from the RP and it stops shooting encapsulated
> packets
>> towards the RP.
>>
>> R1 also gets rid of the "registering" flag for the (S ,G) entry. It also
>> discards all other packets from your Windows server.
>>
>> Now, what do you reckon?
>>
>> Does R1 removes the (S,G)? any timers to expire? no.
>>
>> Actually the IETF has done a nice job here; although your timer is still
>> counting down but as soon as you reach T=0 IF your Multicast source is
> still
>> sending data IT RECREATES the entry and the little (S,G) never gets
> removed;
>> again as long as your source is alive.
>>
>> How about the Register process?
>> As soon as R1 automagically recreates the (S,G) because of the existence of
>> multicast stream it sends another Register message towards the RP.
>>
>> How about the Stop register message?
>> Same concept as before. The RP (if no receivers still out there) does send
> a
>> Stop reg. message towards R1.
>>
>> Then again, if you don't shut down your Windows server you see the
> registering
>> process every 3 minutes but the logic behind it is the fact that R1
> maintains
>> the (S,G) - again if there is a live Multicast source.
>>
>> Problem?
>> Many students try to test this using Ping and they lose the (S,G)! eager to
>> test? use IP SLA to simulate a multicast source or a larger ping.
>>
>> HTH
>> --------------------------
>> Kambiz Agahian
>> CCIE (R&S)
>> CCSI, WAASSE, RSSSE
>> Technical Instructor
>> CCBOOTCAMP - Cisco Learning Solutions Partner (CLSP)
>> Email: kagahian_at_ccbootcamp.com
>> Toll Free: 877-654-2243
>> International: +1-702-968-5100
>> Skype: skype:ccbootcamp?call
>> FAX: +1-702-446-8012
>> YES! We take Cisco Learning Credits!
>> Training And Remote Racks: http://www.ccbootcamp.com
>> OEQ Voice Waiver: http://www.ccbootcamp.com/noeqvoice.html
>> OEQ R&S Waiver: http://www.ccbootcamp.com/noeqrs.html
>> OEQ Commercial: http://www.ccbootcamp.com/noeq.mpg
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Carlos G Mendioroz [mailto:tron_at_huapi.ba.ar]
>> Sent: Mon 4/12/2010 2:31 AM
>> To: Tharindu Rukshan Bamunuarachchi
>> Cc: Kambiz Agahian; ccielab_at_groupstudy.com
>> Subject: Re: Multicast Data
>>
>> Yes, you can:
>>
>> ip pim sparse sg-expiry-timer
>>
>> To adjust the (S, G) expiry timer interval for Protocol Independent
>> Multicast sparse mode (PIM-SM) (S, G) multicast routes (mroutes), use
>> the ip pim sparse sg-expiry-timer command in global configuration mode.
>> To restore the default setting with respect to this command, use the no
>> form of this command.
>>
>> Default, as I said, is 180 seconds, or 3 minutes.
>>
>> But I would think about what is the problem and see if changing this
>> is the better way to go about it. If S -> RP traffic does not generate
>> any problems in your setup, I might just join the RP to the group to
>> keep the mcast path established.
>>
>> -Carlos
>>
>> Tharindu Rukshan Bamunuarachchi @ 11/04/2010 22:51 -0300 dixit:
>>> hm ...
>>>
>>> okay, so if i join the tree after starting the show (e.g. after 20
>>> seconds) ... as RP does not keep potential sources ... i wont receive
>>> multicast data until 3 minutes timeout.
>>>
>>> is it possible to minimize 3 minutes ...
>>> __
>>> tharindu rukshan
>>> blog.tharindu.info <http://blog.tharindu.info>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 5:28 PM, Carlos G Mendioroz <tron_at_huapi.ba.ar
>>> <mailto:tron_at_huapi.ba.ar>> wrote:
>>>
>>>     I'd prefer you making the effort and ask what is that is unclear.
>>>     But there are lots of cases in multicast where things get fixed
>>>     after some timeout, and it happens to be 3 minutes by default.
>>>     The RP keeps no info on potential sources if there are no receivers
>>>     for a group, and will kill the registration attempt w/o joining in
>>>     that case.
>>>
>>>     Makes sense ?
>>>
>>>     Tharindu Rukshan Bamunuarachchi @ 9/04/2010 8:31 -0300 dixit:
>>>     > bit unclear about last point .... please clarify further if you
>>>     can ....
>>>     > __
>>>     > btharindu.blogspot.com <http://btharindu.blogspot.com>
>>>     >
>>>     >
>>>     >
>>>     > On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 4:01 PM, Carlos G Mendioroz
>>>     <tron_at_huapi.ba.ar <mailto:tron_at_huapi.ba.ar>> wrote:
>>>     >
>>>     >> Adding to that that has been said:
>>>     >> -yes, you can loose first, second, third... any, cause Mcast runs
>>>     >> over UDP and there are no L4 delivery warranties. Actually, there
>>>     >> are very few L7 protocols that have assured delivery over mcast.
>>>     >>
>>>     >> -registration does not stop when S (source router) receives join
>> from
>>>     >> RP, so there can be many packets going unicast to RP.
>>>     >> RP tells S to stop registration after it receives direct mcast
>>>     from S,
>>>     >> so no packets lost in between.
>>>     >>
>>>     >> -sending can start before receivers have joined the RP, in which
>> case
>>>     >> the RP will stop registration w/o joining the source. Then you it
>>>     will
>>>     >> start a slow "flapping", trying to register every 3 mins, and being
>>>     >> call to silence untill a receiver shows up.
>>>     >>
>>>     >> I guess you can loose up to 3 minutes of the show if nobody was
>>>     >> listening and you are late to the start :)
>>>     >>
>>>     >> -Carlos
>>>     >>
>>>     >>
>>>     >>
>>>     >> Kambiz Agahian @ 9/04/2010 3:44 -0300 dixit:
>>>     >>> Hi Tharin,
>>>     >>>
>>>     >>> Good point!
>>>     >>> First off, I'm hoping that my interpretation of your question is
>>>     correct
>>>     >>> anyway correct me if your question if not exactly this but
>>>     actually the
>>>     >>> problem is that almost all resources (including most pages on
>>>     cisco.comand
>>>     >>> juniper.com <http://juniper.com> as well as the RFC!) focus on
>>>     the "second" action taken by
>>>     >> the RP
>>>     >>> after receiving the registration request! and the first (but the
>>>     less
>>>     >>> important action) is somehow ignored (or underestimated)....
>>>     >>>
>>>     >>> Here is the process (briefly):
>>>     >>>
>>>     >>> Your Windows 2003 Media server starts sending the Multicast
>>>     packets of
>>>     >> (analog
>>>     >>> term : broadcasting) "The Family guy". The first Mcast packets
>>>     hit their
>>>     >>> gateway and the DR of that segment tries to get a hold of the RP
>>>     to kick
>>>     >> off
>>>     >>> the registration process. You know the encapsulation process
>>>     (the actual
>>>     >> mcast
>>>     >>> content inside a unicast packet - right?) so the RP gets the first
>>>     >> capsule and
>>>     >>> "extracts" the multicast content. At this stage the RP has to
>>>     take two
>>>     >>> actions:
>>>     >>>
>>>     >>> 1- It sends the extracted Multicast packet down the tree based
>>>     on the
>>>     >> (*,G).
>>>     >>> Where did you get that from? my Visa client had talked to his DR
>>>     and his
>>>     >> DR to
>>>     >>> his upstream then to his upstream...all the way up to the RP to
>>>     indicate
>>>     >> his
>>>     >>> interest. So before getting the first packet (the capsule) as you
>>>     >> mentioned
>>>     >>> the RP does know that I'm waiting to watch Quagmire (there is a
>>>     receiver
>>>     >> down
>>>     >>> there). In fact the (*,G) is on the RP waiting for the source to
>>>     come up.
>>>     >>>
>>>     >>> 2- The RP then tries to join the group and now everyone knows
>> what's
>>>     >> gonna
>>>     >>> happen afterwards...I save some key strokes.
>>>     >>>
>>>     >>> Well, as you see (the first action), even the first packet
>>>     (probably the
>>>     >> first
>>>     >>> frame of the Fox ad!) is delivered by the RP to (*,G) to ensure
>>>     nothing's
>>>     >>> going to be missed.
>>>     >>>
>>>     >>> HTH
>>>     >>>
>>>     >>>
>>>     >>>
>>>     >>>
>>>     >>> Kambiz Agahian
>>>     >>> CCIE (R&S)
>>>     >>> CCSI, WAASSE, RSSSE
>>>     >>> Technical Instructor
>>>     >>> CCBOOTCAMP - Cisco Learning Solutions Partner (CLSP)
>>>     >>> Email: kagahian_at_ccbootcamp.com <mailto:kagahian_at_ccbootcamp.com>
>>>     >>> Toll Free: 877-654-2243
>>>     >>> International: +1-702-968-5100
>>>     >>> Skype: skype:ccbootcamp?call
>>>     >>> FAX: +1-702-446-8012
>>>     >>> YES! We take Cisco Learning Credits!
>>>     >>> Training And Remote Racks: http://www.ccbootcamp.com
>>>     >>> OEQ Voice Waiver: http://www.ccbootcamp.com/noeqvoice.html
>>>     >>> OEQ R&S Waiver: http://www.ccbootcamp.com/noeqrs.html
>>>     >>> OEQ Commercial: http://www.ccbootcamp.com/noeq.mpg
>>>     >>>
>>>     >>>
>>>     >>> -----Original Message-----
>>>     >>> From: nobody_at_groupstudy.com <mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com> on
>>>     behalf of Tharindu Rukshan Bamunuarachchi
>>>     >>> Sent: Thu 4/8/2010 10:04 PM
>>>     >>> To: ccielab_at_groupstudy.com <mailto:ccielab_at_groupstudy.com>
>>>     >>> Subject: Multicast Data
>>>     >>>
>>>     >>> hi Experts,
>>>     >>>
>>>     >>> In sparse-mode, AFAIK first packet is forwarded to RP as
>>>     unicast. (In
>>>     >>> Register Unicast process).
>>>     >>>
>>>     >>> Is there any possibility to lose first packet without being
>>>     delivered to
>>>     >>> destination. (assuming destination is already subcribed to
>> multicast
>>>     >> tree)?
>>>     >>>
>>>     >>> __
>>>     >>> btharindu.blogspot.com <http://btharindu.blogspot.com>
>>>     >>>
>>>     >>>
>>>     >>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>>     >>>
>>>     >>>
>>>
> _______________________________________________________________________
>>>     >>> Subscription information may be found at:
>>>     >>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>>     >>>
>>>     >>>
>>>     >>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>>     >>>
>>>     >>>
>>>
> _______________________________________________________________________
>>>     >>> Subscription information may be found at:
>>>     >>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>>     >>>
>>>     >>>
>>>     >>>
>>>     >>>
>>>     >>>
>>>     >>>
>>>     >>>
>>>     >> --
>>>     >> Carlos G Mendioroz  <tron_at_huapi.ba.ar <mailto:tron_at_huapi.ba.ar>>
>>>      LW7 EQI  Argentina
>>>     >
>>>     >
>>>     > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>>     >
>>>     >
>>>
> _______________________________________________________________________
>>>     > Subscription information may be found at:
>>>     > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>>     >
>>>     >
>>>     >
>>>     >
>>>     >
>>>     >
>>>     >
>>>
>>>     --
>>>     Carlos G Mendioroz  <tron_at_huapi.ba.ar <mailto:tron_at_huapi.ba.ar>>
>>>      LW7 EQI  Argentina
>>>
>>>
>> --
>> Carlos G Mendioroz  <tron_at_huapi.ba.ar>  LW7 EQI  Argentina
>>
>>
>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
> 
> --
> Carlos G Mendioroz  <tron_at_huapi.ba.ar>  LW7 EQI  Argentina
> 
> 
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> 
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at: 
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
-- Carlos G Mendioroz <tron_at_huapi.ba.ar> LW7 EQI Argentina Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.netReceived on Mon Apr 12 2010 - 22:13:03 ART
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sat May 01 2010 - 09:49:57 ART