Carlos/Tharin,
Now it's getting a bit off the path...I reckon there is huge confusion here.
Tharin,
Stop learning and just hang on a sec mate.
Carlos,
Where do you get those timers from? 3-min waiting period etc. Please note that
he is talking about a PIM-SM network with a (S,G) entry created on the closest
router to your Multicast source...do you know what's going to happen to this
entry if you're the first receiver and you're late (as you say...)?
If you let me know what you mean by missing packets and waiting times I'll
surely shed some light...
--------------------------
Kambiz Agahian
CCIE (R&S)
CCSI, WAASSE, RSSSE
Technical Instructor
CCBOOTCAMP - Cisco Learning Solutions Partner (CLSP)
Email: kagahian_at_ccbootcamp.com
Toll Free: 877-654-2243
International: +1-702-968-5100
Skype: skype:ccbootcamp?call
FAX: +1-702-446-8012
YES! We take Cisco Learning Credits!
Training And Remote Racks: http://www.ccbootcamp.com
OEQ Voice Waiver: http://www.ccbootcamp.com/noeqvoice.html
OEQ R&S Waiver: http://www.ccbootcamp.com/noeqrs.html
OEQ Commercial: http://www.ccbootcamp.com/noeq.mpg
-----Original Message-----
From: Tharindu Rukshan Bamunuarachchi [mailto:btharindu_at_gmail.com]
Sent: Sun 4/11/2010 6:51 PM
To: Carlos G Mendioroz
Cc: Kambiz Agahian; ccielab_at_groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: Multicast Data
hm ...
okay, so if i join the tree after starting the show (e.g. after 20 seconds)
... as RP does not keep potential sources ... i wont receive multicast data
until 3 minutes timeout.
is it possible to minimize 3 minutes ...
__
tharindu rukshan
blog.tharindu.info
On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 5:28 PM, Carlos G Mendioroz <tron_at_huapi.ba.ar> wrote:
> I'd prefer you making the effort and ask what is that is unclear.
> But there are lots of cases in multicast where things get fixed
> after some timeout, and it happens to be 3 minutes by default.
> The RP keeps no info on potential sources if there are no receivers
> for a group, and will kill the registration attempt w/o joining in
> that case.
>
> Makes sense ?
>
> Tharindu Rukshan Bamunuarachchi @ 9/04/2010 8:31 -0300 dixit:
> > bit unclear about last point .... please clarify further if you can ....
> > __
> > btharindu.blogspot.com
> >
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 4:01 PM, Carlos G Mendioroz <tron_at_huapi.ba.ar>
> wrote:
> >
> >> Adding to that that has been said:
> >> -yes, you can loose first, second, third... any, cause Mcast runs
> >> over UDP and there are no L4 delivery warranties. Actually, there
> >> are very few L7 protocols that have assured delivery over mcast.
> >>
> >> -registration does not stop when S (source router) receives join from
> >> RP, so there can be many packets going unicast to RP.
> >> RP tells S to stop registration after it receives direct mcast from S,
> >> so no packets lost in between.
> >>
> >> -sending can start before receivers have joined the RP, in which case
> >> the RP will stop registration w/o joining the source. Then you it will
> >> start a slow "flapping", trying to register every 3 mins, and being
> >> call to silence untill a receiver shows up.
> >>
> >> I guess you can loose up to 3 minutes of the show if nobody was
> >> listening and you are late to the start :)
> >>
> >> -Carlos
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Kambiz Agahian @ 9/04/2010 3:44 -0300 dixit:
> >>> Hi Tharin,
> >>>
> >>> Good point!
> >>> First off, I'm hoping that my interpretation of your question is
> correct
> >>> anyway correct me if your question if not exactly this but actually the
> >>> problem is that almost all resources (including most pages on
> cisco.comand
> >>> juniper.com as well as the RFC!) focus on the "second" action taken by
> >> the RP
> >>> after receiving the registration request! and the first (but the less
> >>> important action) is somehow ignored (or underestimated)....
> >>>
> >>> Here is the process (briefly):
> >>>
> >>> Your Windows 2003 Media server starts sending the Multicast packets of
> >> (analog
> >>> term : broadcasting) "The Family guy". The first Mcast packets hit
> their
> >>> gateway and the DR of that segment tries to get a hold of the RP to
> kick
> >> off
> >>> the registration process. You know the encapsulation process (the
> actual
> >> mcast
> >>> content inside a unicast packet - right?) so the RP gets the first
> >> capsule and
> >>> "extracts" the multicast content. At this stage the RP has to take two
> >>> actions:
> >>>
> >>> 1- It sends the extracted Multicast packet down the tree based on the
> >> (*,G).
> >>> Where did you get that from? my Visa client had talked to his DR and
> his
> >> DR to
> >>> his upstream then to his upstream...all the way up to the RP to
> indicate
> >> his
> >>> interest. So before getting the first packet (the capsule) as you
> >> mentioned
> >>> the RP does know that I'm waiting to watch Quagmire (there is a
> receiver
> >> down
> >>> there). In fact the (*,G) is on the RP waiting for the source to come
> up.
> >>>
> >>> 2- The RP then tries to join the group and now everyone knows what's
> >> gonna
> >>> happen afterwards...I save some key strokes.
> >>>
> >>> Well, as you see (the first action), even the first packet (probably
> the
> >> first
> >>> frame of the Fox ad!) is delivered by the RP to (*,G) to ensure
> nothing's
> >>> going to be missed.
> >>>
> >>> HTH
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Kambiz Agahian
> >>> CCIE (R&S)
> >>> CCSI, WAASSE, RSSSE
> >>> Technical Instructor
> >>> CCBOOTCAMP - Cisco Learning Solutions Partner (CLSP)
> >>> Email: kagahian_at_ccbootcamp.com
> >>> Toll Free: 877-654-2243
> >>> International: +1-702-968-5100
> >>> Skype: skype:ccbootcamp?call
> >>> FAX: +1-702-446-8012
> >>> YES! We take Cisco Learning Credits!
> >>> Training And Remote Racks: http://www.ccbootcamp.com
> >>> OEQ Voice Waiver: http://www.ccbootcamp.com/noeqvoice.html
> >>> OEQ R&S Waiver: http://www.ccbootcamp.com/noeqrs.html
> >>> OEQ Commercial: http://www.ccbootcamp.com/noeq.mpg
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> -----Original Message-----
> >>> From: nobody_at_groupstudy.com on behalf of Tharindu Rukshan
> Bamunuarachchi
> >>> Sent: Thu 4/8/2010 10:04 PM
> >>> To: ccielab_at_groupstudy.com
> >>> Subject: Multicast Data
> >>>
> >>> hi Experts,
> >>>
> >>> In sparse-mode, AFAIK first packet is forwarded to RP as unicast. (In
> >>> Register Unicast process).
> >>>
> >>> Is there any possibility to lose first packet without being delivered
> to
> >>> destination. (assuming destination is already subcribed to multicast
> >> tree)?
> >>>
> >>> __
> >>> btharindu.blogspot.com
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________________________________
> >>> Subscription information may be found at:
> >>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________________________________
> >>> Subscription information may be found at:
> >>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >> --
> >> Carlos G Mendioroz <tron_at_huapi.ba.ar> LW7 EQI Argentina
> >
> >
> > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> --
> Carlos G Mendioroz <tron_at_huapi.ba.ar> LW7 EQI Argentina
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Sun Apr 11 2010 - 19:46:39 ART
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sat May 01 2010 - 09:49:57 ART