Yeah it does make sense...
thanks
On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 11:19 AM, Kambiz Agahian <kagahian_at_ccbootcamp.com> wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> This is a design issue. Based on the best practices in small to medium size sites 61 goes on the internal interface and 62 is configured on the external interface; however IF you have a data center with many servers behind (logically not physically) the WAAS then 62 inside and 61 outside.
>
> Does it make sense?
>
> HTH,
>
>
> --------------------------
> Kambiz Agahian
> CCIE (R&S)
> CCSI, WAASSE, RSSSE
> Technical Instructor
> CCBOOTCAMP - Cisco Learning Solutions Partner (CLSP)
> Email: kagahian_at_ccbootcamp.com
> Toll Free: 877-654-2243
> International: +1-702-968-5100
> Skype: skype:ccbootcamp?call
> FAX: +1-702-446-8012
> YES! We take Cisco Learning Credits!
> Training And Remote Racks: http://www.ccbootcamp.com
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody_at_groupstudy.com on behalf of Group Study
> Sent: Fri 4/9/2010 5:52 AM
> To: Cisco certification
> Subject: OT: WCCP and WAEs
>
> question about Service 61 and 62.
>
> On the remote site, I have 61 on the LAN interface and 62 on the WAN
> interface. Does it matter that I have 61 on the WAN interface on the
> Data Center Router and 62 on the LAN? Effectively the opposite of the
> remote site?
>
> I would think it does since 61 is based on Source and 62 on Destination...
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Fri Apr 09 2010 - 11:47:01 ART
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sat May 01 2010 - 09:49:56 ART