Re: Maximum-path ibgp

Hi,

but if maximum path is configured and next hop are 2 diffrent PE , so wont
it install both next hops in routing table if MXIMUM-path ibgp is
configured.

On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 7:29 PM, Muzammil Mukhtar <
muzammil_mukhtar_at_hotmail.com> wrote:

> Hello,
>
>
>
> The main purpose of this to improve the convergence time if you've multiple
> route reflectors and the next hop is the same.
>
>
>
> For your setup, it may not make a difference as you are only learning the
> prefix from two PEs, this feature is usually used where you've multiple
> Route-reflectors where route is only imported from the RR with the lower
> loopback.
>
>
>
> ...Muhammad
>
>
>
> > Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2010 00:14:49 -0700
> > Subject: Maximum-path ibgp
> > From: naman.prep_at_gmail.com
> > To: ccielab_at_groupstudy.com
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I need to understand the difference between normal maximum-path ibgp and
> > maximum-path ibgp import. Now suppose if a PE is getting a same route
> from
> 2
> > different PE via a ibgp VPNv4 session.
> >
> > So if maximum-path ibgp is configured in that address-family it will put
> 2
> > routes in the VRF routing table. So what difference will it make if i
> > configure import keyword along with this command.
> >
> > thanks
> >
> >
> > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Check your Hotmail from your phone.
> http://go.microsoft.com/?linkid=9712957
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Wed Mar 31 2010 - 20:11:21 ART