Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] BGP design question

We are running 12.4(15)T11 on all routers. But i tested this in 12.3 T.
 I will try it again on 12.4(15)T11 code and verify the latency.

Thanks

On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 10:58 AM, Marko Milivojevic <markom_at_ipexpert.com>wrote:

> On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 17:51, Narbik Kocharians <narbikk_at_gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > As i stated in my e-mail, the latency that i saw was in 2 different
> areas,
> > one area was the correct next-hop being injected into the routers which
> was
> > a direct result of the peer session being terminated between scan
> intervals.
> > When i was testing this feature, once BGP detected the adjacency change,
> it
> > terminated the peering between the scan intervals. Again, if you tested
> this
> > with what ever version of IOS you have and it worked correctly without
> this
> > latency being an issue, then, it is a nice solution. so once again when
> you
> > tested this, was the latency an issue?
>
> There were no issues that I noticed, especially since BGP scanner is
> nowadays is not used for next-hop tracking. There is a different
> method, as you are probably aware.
>
> Oh yeah, this also doesn't work in IOS older than 12.4(4)T - bummer.
>
> --
> Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427
> Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert
>
> YES! We include 400 hours of REAL rack
> time with our Blended Learning Solution!
>
> Mailto: markom_at_ipexpert.com
> Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
> Fax: +1.810.454.0130
> Web: http://www.ipexpert.com/
>

-- 
Narbik Kocharians
CCSI#30832, CCIE# 12410 (R&S, SP, Security)
www.MicronicsTraining.com
Sr. Technical Instructor
YES! We take Cisco Learning Credits!
Training And Remote Racks available
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net