Make sure that your sham-link endpoints are not redistributed into OSPF.
-- Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427 Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert YES! We include 400 hours of REAL rack time with our Blended Learning Solution! Mailto: markom_at_ipexpert.com Telephone: +1.810.326.1444 Fax: +1.810.454.0130 Web: http://www.ipexpert.com/ On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 17:13, CCIE-Newbie <ccie_ka_at_gmx.de> wrote: > Hi Group, > > I'm trying so long to configure a sham-link between two PE router ... > The sham-link source and destination address is in the vrf routing table > and this ip address is advertised through MP-BGP.. > When I do show ip route vrf XX > I saw the routes on both sides... > > Next I debug OSPF > 1. area 0 sham-link <source IF> <des IF> > > there comes a message from OSPF > OSPF : starting sham-link interface > OSPF : no route to sham-link destination x.x.x.x > > This seems to be strange for me because this interface is configured > with the "ip forwarding vrf XX" and also is advertised in the > "address-family ipv4 vrf XX > network x.x.x.x mask y.y.y.y > > THe Interface is defined as a host address (32 bit) > > Maybe I read all about configuring sham-links...but this doesn't come > up ...;-( > > I tried so long and this makes me grazy... > > Thanks for all advice > > Dennis > > > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net > > _______________________________________________________________________ > Subscription information may be found at: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.netReceived on Fri Mar 26 2010 - 17:29:59 ART
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu Apr 01 2010 - 07:26:36 ART