Re: Sham-Link - Problem

From: Marko Milivojevic <markom_at_ipexpert.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 17:29:59 +0000

Make sure that your sham-link endpoints are not redistributed into OSPF.

--
Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427
Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert
YES! We include 400 hours of REAL rack
time with our Blended Learning Solution!
Mailto: markom_at_ipexpert.com
Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
Fax: +1.810.454.0130
Web: http://www.ipexpert.com/
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 17:13, CCIE-Newbie <ccie_ka_at_gmx.de> wrote:
> Hi Group,
>
> I'm trying so long to configure a sham-link between two PE router ...
> The sham-link source and destination address is in the vrf routing table
> and this ip address is advertised through MP-BGP..
> When I do show ip route vrf XX
> I saw the routes on both sides...
>
> Next I debug OSPF
> 1. area 0 sham-link <source IF> <des IF>
>
> there comes a message from OSPF
> OSPF : starting sham-link interface
> OSPF : no route to sham-link destination x.x.x.x
>
> This seems to be strange for me because this interface is configured
> with the "ip forwarding vrf XX" and also is advertised in the
> "address-family ipv4 vrf XX
> network x.x.x.x mask y.y.y.y
>
> THe Interface is defined as a host address (32 bit)
>
> Maybe I read all about configuring sham-links...but this doesn't come
> up ...;-(
>
> I tried so long and this makes me grazy...
>
> Thanks for all advice
>
> Dennis
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Fri Mar 26 2010 - 17:29:59 ART

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu Apr 01 2010 - 07:26:36 ART