Re: Protection against Man-in -d -middle attack

Both of you are awesome! Have to say I also learnt something new here so
more of the bun fight ladies :-)

When Narbik mentioned the "static" keyword, I though he was referring to the
static binding of an IP to mac, which I was going to say also requires DHCP
snooping to be switched on but later realised he referred to a static ARP
entry.

Great demo of skills from both of u!

On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 8:15 PM, Marko Milivojevic <markom_at_ipexpert.com>wrote:

> Thanks Narbik.
>
> Now to be truly honest, my labs started as the way to prove you wrong.
> However, I soon realized it was ME who was wrong, but decided to post
> the lab anyway, since I thought it was a good example.
>
> I agree with the point that I should have kept all the messages Cat2
> was spewing on the console. Overall, I think between two labs we
> posted, this subject is very well covered.
>
> Anyone has something else Narbik and I can argue about? Keep it
> technical, I'm tired of waving the waivers ;-)
>
> --
> Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427
> Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert
>
> YES! We include 400 hours of REAL rack
> time with our Blended Learning Solution!
>
> Mailto: markom_at_ipexpert.com
> Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
> Fax: +1.810.454.0130
> Web: http://www.ipexpert.com/
>
> On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 18:43, Narbik Kocharians <narbikk_at_gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Guys,
> >
> >
> >
> > I truly was NOT trying to rub it in, we all know that Marko knows his
> stuff,
> > if you ever doubt it, just go back and read some of his posts/answers,
> the
> > man is simply awesome.
> >
> >
> >
> > The point I was trying to get across was that when testing this kind of
> > stuff, you should always check the right console messages, and the right
> way
> > of testing.
> >
> >
> >
> > You should purposely try to make some errors and see some of the console
> > messages, which I showed in my post; this is how you nail it down. This
> is
> > how you ACEB the TS portion of the lab.B As Marko mentioned, when in
> doubt
> > lab it.
> >
> > Thanks itechguru.
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 5:46 AM, Itechguru <wajid.ccie_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Narbik
> >>
> >> As always, you are awesome. I cannot say that for others.
> >> Great demonstration.
> >> On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 7:49 AM, Marko Milivojevic <markom_at_ipexpert.com
> >
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 09:16, Narbik Kocharians <narbikk_at_gmail.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>> > MArko,
> >>> >
> >>> > Did you just prove what i stated was correct?
> >>>
> >>> Didn't I write that very clearly at the top of my message. No point
> >>> rubbing it in... :-)
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427
> >>> Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert
> >>>
> >>> YES! We include 400 hours of REAL rack
> >>> time with our Blended Learning Solution!
> >>>
> >>> Mailto: markom_at_ipexpert.com
> >>> Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
> >>> Fax: +1.810.454.0130
> >>> Web: http://www.ipexpert.com/
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________________________________
> >>> Subscription information may be found at:
> >>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Narbik Kocharians
> > CCSI#30832, CCIE# 12410 (R&S, SP, Security)
> > www.MicronicsTraining.com
> > Sr. Technical Instructor
> > YES! We take Cisco Learning Credits!
> > Training And Remote Racks available
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

-- 
CCIE #19963
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net