Re: RIP Timers

From: S Malik <ccie.09_at_gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 09:47:55 -0400

Please see Notes left by
badalam_nt<https://supportforums.cisco.com/people/badalam_nt;jsessionid=29F0D9DF9F8D64A7F89CDBE031F2353B.node0>at
the following site:

https://supportforums.cisco.com/message/608307#608307

On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 10:53 PM, Sarad <tosara_at_gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi All,
>
> I have some concerns on RIP timers. Would like to clear it out, As per RIP
> default timers, Update = 30, Invalid = 180, holddown=180, flush = 240
> Let say a router got an update saying particular destination is down. Ok
> then it will go to invalid after 180 seconds time between the Invalid (180)
> to flush(240) router still route the packet to destination ie its still in
> the routing table. It's only will be removed after flush timer expires.
>
> My question is Ok if I get a new route with larger metric to the same
> destination it will not be install to the routing table untill holddown
> timer expires let say when hold down timer expires it will add the new
> route
> to the Routing table but my question is as Holddown timer is less than the
> flush timer how can a router can add a route with a higher distance before
> flush timer expire. Or will hold down timer will trigger the flush timer.
>
> Whats the best debug or show command to monitor this set up?
>
> Thanks
> Sara
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Mon Mar 22 2010 - 09:47:55 ART

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu Apr 01 2010 - 07:26:35 ART