RE: STP root bridge question?

From: Chaz Brown <chazstats_at_gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2010 16:27:53 -0700

When your signature is longer than almost all of your posts, you have a
problem.

-----Original Message-----
From: nobody_at_groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
jastorino_at_ipexpert.com
Sent: Monday, March 15, 2010 4:07 PM
To: Ivan Hrvatska; Marko Milivojevic
Cc: CCIE Groupstudy
Subject: Re: STP root bridge question?

Yeah that would be a BAD idea here : ) can you shutdown links?

------Original Message------
From: Ivan Hrvatska
Sender: nobody_at_groupstudy.com
To: Marko Milivojevic
Cc: CCIE Groupstudy
ReplyTo: Ivan Hrvatska
Subject: Re: STP root bridge question?
Sent: Mar 15, 2010 6:47 PM

Yes, I know. I would never do that in real life :)

On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 11:44 PM, Marko Milivojevic <markom_at_ipexpert.com>
wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 22:42, Ivan Hrvatska <ivanzghr_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>> Ignore my last post. My mistake. I think that's it. Disabling STP on
switch SW2.
>> The problem now is that SW3 isn't using direct link to new root SW4.
>> Instead, it goes through SW2....
>
> I sincerely believe that you may have much bigger problem in your
> network at the moment (bridging loop). Disabling STP in that
> environment is ... serious trouble.
>
> But... you asked for alternatives ;-)
>
> --
> Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427
> Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert
>
> Mailto: markom_at_ipexpert.com
> Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
> Fax: +1.810.454.0130
> Web: http://www.ipexpert.com/

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Mon Mar 15 2010 - 16:27:53 ART

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu Apr 01 2010 - 07:26:35 ART