Re: STP root bridge question?

From: Joe Astorino <jastorino_at_ipexpert.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2010 18:17:55 -0400

Can you indirectly change the priority? If so, you could use "spanning-tree
vlan 1-4094 root primary" on the switch that IS the root and then utilize
root guard. That would be one way.

On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 6:13 PM, Ivan Hrvatska <ivanzghr_at_gmail.com> wrote:

> Hello,
>
> if you have topology like this:
>
> sw1-----sw2
> | \ / |
> | \ / |
> | / \ |
> sw3------sw4
>
> all trunks between switches are etherchannel. Let say you don't want
> that SW2 becomes root for any VLAN. How can you accomplish that
> without changing priority on any of switches? STP used is RPVST.
>
> Regards
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

-- 
Regards,
Joe Astorino - CCIE #24347
Sr. Technical Instructor - IPexpert
Mailto: jastorino_at_ipexpert.com
Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
Live Assistance, Please visit: www.ipexpert.com/chat
eFax: +1.810.454.0130
IPexpert is a premier provider of Self-Study Workbooks, Video on Demand,
Audio Tools, Online Hardware Rental and Classroom Training for the Cisco
CCIE (R&S, Voice, Security & Service Provider) certification(s) with
training locations throughout the United States, Europe, South Asia and
Australia. Be sure to visit our online communities at
www.ipexpert.com/communities and our public website at www.ipexpert.com
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Mon Mar 15 2010 - 18:17:55 ART

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu Apr 01 2010 - 07:26:35 ART