You could always try source routing. I doubt it'll work, but there's no harm
in trying.
-- Cheers, Jared Scrivener CCSI #30878, CCIE3 #16983 (R&S, SP, Security) www.MicronicsTraining.com Sr. Technical Instructor YES! We take Cisco Learning Credits! Training And Remote Racks available LinkedIn:www.linkedin.com/in/jaredscrivener On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 2:38 AM, Bradley Freeman < bradley_at_communitystring.com> wrote: > > > Is there any way to make this right by getting the constant delay > > > (Ex:200ms > > > - 250ms) ? Or is this the nature of the internet? (Dynamic > > > characteristics > > > of the internet). (not by hard coding the stuff like having one > > address > > Also if you are looking at the range of 200ms to 250ms for replies to > popular sites that's crazy high, below is what you can expect if you have > setup private peerings with them. Something has to go seriously wrong for > the RTT to go much higher as we control as much of the path of the path as > we possibly can. > > $ ping 8.8.8.8 > PING 8.8.8.8 (8.8.8.8): 56 data bytes > 64 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=10 ms > 64 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=9 ms > 64 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=9 ms > > ----8.8.8.8 PING Statistics---- > 3 packets transmitted, 3 packets received, 0.0% packet loss > round-trip (ms) min/avg/max/med = 9/9/10/9 > > > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net > > _______________________________________________________________________ > Subscription information may be found at: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html > > > > > > > > -- Cheers, Jared Scrivener CCSI #30878, CCIE3 #16983 (R&S, SP, Security) www.MicronicsTraining.com Sr. Technical Instructor YES! We take Cisco Learning Credits! Training And Remote Racks available LinkedIn:www.linkedin.com/in/jaredscrivener Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.netReceived on Sat Feb 13 2010 - 23:40:49 ART
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Mar 01 2010 - 06:28:35 ART