well looks like the 3 attributes is the right idea, see the following test
using cisco phone with poe and with power brick...I didnt have a chance to
get the voiphopper on my PC, but i assume that if i tried to 'emulate' a
cisco phone without using poe it would errdisable the port as well...
but if you are using a program like voiphopper on a device with poe
capability, not sure that this command would see it any different than the
cisco phone...
a test for another time, this is an interesting command, that i didnt know
before though...
QOS_TEST#sh run int g0/4
interface GigabitEthernet0/4
switchport access vlan 11
switchport voice vlan 51
switchport voice detect cisco-phone full-duplex
spanning-tree portfast
PLUG PC INTO PORT and WAIT to see what happens approx 8 mins, nothing
happens:
QOS_TEST#sh clo
05:44:06.764 UTC Sat Feb 13 2010
QOS_TEST#sh int g0/4
GigabitEthernet0/4 is up, line protocol is up (connected)
QOS_TEST#sh clo
05:51:56.719 UTC Sat Feb 13 2010
QOS_TEST#sh int g0/4
GigabitEthernet0/4 is up, line protocol is up (connected)
SO ADD A PHONE, using power brick:
QOS_TEST#
00:22:07: %CPDE-6-DETECT: Device detected on GigabitEthernet0/4 violating
configuration
00:22:07: %PM-4-ERR_DISABLE: security-violation error detected on Gi0/4,
putting Gi0/4 in err-disable state
UNPLUG POWER BRICK from PHONE:
QOS_TEST(config-if)#no shut
QOS_TEST(config-if)#
00:25:17: %ILPOWER-7-DETECT: Interface Gi0/4: Power Device detected: IEEE PD
00:25:18: %ILPOWER-5-POWER_GRANTED: Interface Gi0/4: Power granted
00:25:19: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface GigabitEthernet0/4, changed state to
down
00:25:22: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface GigabitEthernet0/4, changed state to up
00:25:23: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface
GigabitEthernet0/4, changed state to up
00:27:01: %CPDE-6-DETECT: Cisco IP Phone 7971 detected on GigabitEthernet0/4
in full duplex mode
QOS_TEST#sh cdp neighbors detail
-------------------------
Device ID: SEP0022905C3F55
Entry address(es):
Platform: Cisco IP Phone 7971, Capabilities: Host Phone
Interface: GigabitEthernet0/4, Port ID (outgoing port): Port 1
Holdtime : 124 sec
Version :
SCCP70.8-3-3SR2S
advertisement version: 2
Duplex: full
Power drawn: 14.900 Watts
Power request id: 16213, Power management id: 1
Power request levels are:14900 0 0 0 0
Management address(es):
QOS_TEST#sh int g0/4
GigabitEthernet0/4 is up, line protocol is up (connected)
REMOVE PHONE and PLUG PC into port:
QOS_TEST#
00:28:42: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface
GigabitEthernet0/4, changed state to down
00:28:42: %ILPOWER-5-IEEE_DISCONNECT: Interface Gi0/4: PD removed
00:28:43: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface GigabitEthernet0/4, changed state to
down
00:28:57: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface GigabitEthernet0/4, changed state to up
00:28:58: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface
GigabitEthernet0/4, changed state to up
PLUG PHONE BACK INTO PORT, without power brick:
00:31:08: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface GigabitEthernet0/4, changed state to
down
00:31:10: %ILPOWER-7-DETECT: Interface Gi0/4: Power Device detected: IEEE PD
00:31:11: %ILPOWER-7-DETECT: Interface Gi0/4: Power Device detected: IEEE PD
00:31:12: %ILPOWER-5-POWER_GRANTED: Interface Gi0/4: Power granted
00:31:16: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface GigabitEthernet0/4, changed state to up
00:31:17: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface
GigabitEthernet0/4, changed state to up
00:32:54: %CPDE-6-DETECT: Cisco IP Phone 7971 detected on GigabitEthernet0/4
in full duplex mode
PLUG IN PHONE using power brick:
QOS_TEST#
00:34:43: %ILPOWER-5-IEEE_DISCONNECT: Interface Gi0/4: PD removed
00:34:43: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface
GigabitEthernet0/4, changed state to down
00:34:44: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface GigabitEthernet0/4, changed state to
down
00:34:51: %CPDE-6-DETECT: Device detected on GigabitEthernet0/4 violating
configuration
00:34:51: %PM-4-ERR_DISABLE: security-violation error detected on Gi0/4,
putting Gi0/4 in err-disable state
QOS_TEST#sh int g0/4
GigabitEthernet0/4 is down, line protocol is down (err-disabled)
-- Garry L. Baker "There is no 'patch' for stupidity." - www.sqlsecurity.com On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 3:01 PM, Sadiq Yakasai <sadiqtanko_at_gmail.com> wrote: > Guys, > > So that command actually checks 3 attributes on a device connection, AFAIK. > I have not verified it but this is my take on it: > > It checks for CDP messages, Full Duplex and PoE for the connecting device, > else err-disable the port. > > Gary, when you tried your hack with connecting a PC, did you wait like 2 > minutes? Try waiting that long and see if the port indeed goes into > err-disabled state. > > Sadiq > > > On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 10:14 AM, garry baker <baker.garry_at_gmail.com>wrote: > >> yeah that is a good find on that link, and the voiphopper, good stuff, so >> i >> tried the command and plugged a PC in... >> >> but nothing happened, guess i will need to get more creative, and try a >> phone then a PC and see if anything happens, maybe after a 'trust' happens >> on the port.... >> >> maybe even get the voiphopper and play around... >> >> cause i cannot seem to find any thing else about... >> >> anybody else seen this in a real case and how it works? >> >> thanks.. >> garry.. >> >> >> On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 8:44 AM, Tyson Scott <tscott_at_ipexpert.com> wrote: >> >> > Garry, >> > >> > From reading the following: >> > >> > >> > >> https://supportforums.cisco.com/thread/236503.pdf;jsessionid=D81A3BD19C0F114 >> > 1EB3C5A3288ADD32A.node0 >> > >> > It looks like it is used to help protect a switchport from allowing any >> > user >> > to plug into a port and join the voice VLAN for snooping the Voice VLAN >> > without the CDP exchange used between Cisco Phones and the switch. I >> was >> > not sure about the command until finding this. It was interesting to >> find. >> > >> > Regards, >> > >> > Tyson Scott - CCIE #13513 R&S, Security, and SP >> > Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc. >> > Mailto: tscott_at_ipexpert.com >> > Telephone: +1.810.326.1444, ext. 208 >> > Live Assistance, Please visit: www.ipexpert.com/chat >> > eFax: +1.810.454.0130 >> > >> > >> > >> > -----Original Message----- >> > From: nobody_at_groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of >> > garry baker >> > Sent: Friday, February 12, 2010 12:00 AM >> > To: Cisco certification >> > Subject: switchport voice detect cisco-phone >> > >> > I came across this command and I do not have a cisco phone to test with, >> > wondering if anyone knows what this does and is used to do or NOT to >> do... >> > >> > 'switchport voice detect cisco-phone' >> > >> > >> > >> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/switches/lan/catalyst3560/software/release/1 >> > 2.2_52_se/command/reference/cli3.html#wp3464954 >> > >> > >> > Thanks.. >> > Garry.. >> > >> > >> > Garry L. Baker >> > >> > "There is no 'patch' for stupidity." - www.sqlsecurity.com >> > >> > >> > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net >> > >> > _______________________________________________________________________ >> > Subscription information may be found at: >> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html >> >> >> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net >> >> _______________________________________________________________________ >> Subscription information may be found at: >> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > -- > CCIE #19963 Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.netReceived on Sat Feb 13 2010 - 06:14:50 ART
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Mar 01 2010 - 06:28:35 ART