RE: DLSw reachability; Ethernet MAC addresses

From: David Prall <dcp_at_dcptech.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2010 21:41:01 -0500

Could you imagine how annoying an 80 character screen would be if all of the
netflow was expanded to decimal.

What about troubleshooting a mainframe application where the connection is
coming from non-canonical address X and you are looking at the endpoint but
can't find X because it is displayed in canonical format.

It all depends on what you are doing at the time.

David

--
http://dcp.dcptech.com
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody_at_groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> Dale Shaw
> Sent: Wednesday, February 10, 2010 9:35 PM
> To: Tyson Scott
> Cc: Cisco certification
> Subject: Re: DLSw reachability; Ethernet MAC addresses
> 
> Hi Tyson,
> 
> On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 12:21 PM, Tyson Scott <tscott_at_ipexpert.com>
> wrote:
> > That is because the MAC's are transposed.  You need to convert from
> > non-canonical to canonical.
> >
> > Here is an old archive that shows how to do this process.
> >
> > http://www.mail-archive.com/cisco@groupstudy.com/msg11230.html
> 
> That did the trick. The 'show dlsw' outputs show MACs in non-canonical
> form. When converted, I can trace the MACs the usual way.
> 
> I can't figure out if this is less or more annoying than 'show ip
> cache flow' showing transport layer (port) information in hex.
> 
> cheers,
> Dale
> 
> 
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> 
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Wed Feb 10 2010 - 21:41:01 ART

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Mar 01 2010 - 06:28:35 ART