Hi,
It seems like you're missing the concept of ISIS route leaking on
L1/L2 routers. However, If you indeed hate that idea, then you have
two basic choices for constructing PE2PE LSPs with IGP route
summarization. Either use inter-area MPLS TE tunnels between the PEs
or create an overlay BGP mesh that spans over L1/L2 routers and PEs
and propagates the PE Loopback prefixes. Using those two ways you may
effectively create LSPs even when with IGP route summarization in
place. Detailed configurations are a bit complicated for each case, so
I omit those. There are other solutions proposed to resolve the
"summarization" problem (there is even an RFC), but Cisco does not
implement them (yet).
HTH,
-- Petr Lapukhov, petr_at_INE.com CCIE #16379 (R&S/Security/SP/Voice) Internetwork Expert, Inc. http://www.INE.com Toll Free: 877-224-8987 Outside US: 775-826-4344 2010/2/9 Service Provider <service.providersa_at_gmail.com>: > Hi guys > > I have a scenario where one of the PE routers is a Level-1 and connects to a > P router which is L1L2. The problem is that the L1 has a default route from > the P router, which if fine, but I'm unable to have end-to-end reachability > between the CE routers. I am only able to achieve this when I redistribute > Level-2 routes into Level-1 on the P router. I have configure the Level-1 > router to generate the label(s) for the default route but I still don't have > connectivity between the CE routers. > > CE1-------------PE1-----------------------P----------------------PE1--------------------------CE2 > L1 L1L2 L2 > > Any assistance will be appreciated. > > Thank you > SP > > > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net > > _______________________________________________________________________ > Subscription information may be found at: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.netReceived on Tue Feb 09 2010 - 14:34:28 ART
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Mar 01 2010 - 06:28:35 ART