Re: Interpretation of rack number

From: Alexei Monastyrnyi <alexeim73_at_gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2010 12:28:07 +0100

Back in time when it was ATM in the lab, one would need to convert a
rack number into hex to use it in ATM configuration bits. Now imagine
all the stress during the lab and a rack number say 11 (which is not
unusual for Brussels facilities). It happened to my friend and he lost
30 minutes trying to get why the hell is ATM circuit not coming up with
such a simple configuration. :-) I learned this from him and was
watching for that pitfall, but I got rack number 05. :-)

A.

On 2010-02-04 11:39, Sadiq Yakasai wrote:
> Agreed! You should clarify this very well! This little confusion once made
> me had an expensive lunch out of town! ;-)
>
> On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 12:13 AM, Multiple CCIE<multipleccie_at_gmail.com>wrote:
>
>
>> Hello SP,
>> Your Rack # is technically "06", thus any single digit rack # would be
>> preceded by a zero making it a two digit number.
>>
>> So your IP would be 150.1.06.6 /32
>>
>> Cheers,
>> MC
>>
>>
>> On Feb 3, 2010, at 3:26 PM, Service Provider wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Hello
>>>
>>> If the question asks that the loopback IP of router should in the format
>>> 150.1.*yy*.x/32, where by yy is the rack number and x is the router
>>>
>> number.
>>
>>> Suppose I get rack number 6, and working on router 6, would the correct
>>> answer be 150.1.*6*.6/32 or 150.1.*66*.6/32 on the loopback interface?
>>>
>>> Thank you.
>>> SP
>>>
>>> _____________________________________________________________________
>>> Subscription information: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/comserv.html
>>>
>>
>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Thu Feb 04 2010 - 12:28:07 ART

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Mar 01 2010 - 06:28:35 ART