RE: OT: MPLS and CCIE v4 Blue Print

So at this moment, not to worry about the IPv6, QoS and TE with MPLS
Regards,Khalid

> Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2010 22:13:31 +0300
> Subject: Re: OT: MPLS and CCIE v4 Blue Print
> From: nrafia_at_gmail.com
> To: khalid_khursheed_at_hotmail.com
> CC: ccielab_at_groupstudy.com
>
> I think going with Anthony's way is preffered one at this stage of feed back
> from other candidates being in lab.
> If we got some news other than on EX-BP then other topics can be considered.
> BP is already so broad that covering it seems quite difficult task.
>
> HTH
>
> On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 9:51 PM, Syed Khalid Ali <
> khalid_khursheed_at_hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Group:
>> Below is the text from CCIE v4 Blue Print:4.00 Implement MPLS Layer 3
>> VPNs4.10
>> Implement Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS)4.20 Implement Layer 3
>> virtual
>> private networks (VPNs) on provider edge (PE), provider (P), and customer
>> edge
>> (CE) routers4.30 Implement virtual routing and forwarding (VRF) and
>> Multi-VRF
>> Customer Edge (VRF-Lite)
>>
>> They have describe it really quick. Is the following will be inherited
>> including:1- IPv62- QoS3- Traffic Engineering
>> Or I should put down my head and go thorough the expanded blue print
>> suggested
>> by Anthony on INE
>> blog.
>> http://blog.internetworkexpert.com/2009/05/12/ccie-rs-4x-expanded-study-
>> blueprint/#more-1139
>>
>> thanksKhalid
>>
>> _________________________________________________________________
>> Your E-mail and More On-the-Go. Get Windows Live Hotmail Free.
>> https://signup.live.com/signup.aspx?id=60969
>>
>>
>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
                                               
Received on Thu Feb 04 2010 - 00:26:44 ART