Re: switchport protected

I think it would probably accomplish what you want, but I'm not sure
it would be the best thing : ) I fear it might be like trying to kill
a little rabbit with a 12 gauge shotgun. You would be cutting off any
communication at L2 between devices on protected interfaces.

On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 2:11 PM, Jack <ccie.unnumbered_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> Old 3500 XL switches do not have DHCP snooping.
> I was wondering if we set "sw prot" on all client ports, will it address the
> DHCP bogie server problem? What is the drawback of setting all client ports
> to protected mode?
>
> Thanks,
> Jack
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

-- 
Regards,
Joe Astorino CCIE #24347 (R&S)
Sr. Technical Instructor - IPexpert
Mailto: jastorino_at_ipexpert.com
Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
Live Assistance, Please visit: www.ipexpert.com/chat
eFax: +1.810.454.0130
IPexpert is a premier provider of Classroom and Self-Study Cisco CCNA
(R&S, Voice & Security), CCNP, CCVP, CCSP and CCIE (R&S, Voice,
Security & Service Provider) Certification Training with locations
throughout the United States, Europe and Australia. Be sure to check
out our online communities at www.ipexpert.com/communities and our
public website at www.ipexpert.com
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net