Re: OT: Dynamic GRE? (or secureless DMVPN)

From: Persio Pucci <persio_at_gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 13:52:58 -0200

thanks man! sorry for being too lazy on trying it before asking... :D

On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 1:42 PM, Tyson Scott <tscott_at_ipexpert.com> wrote:

> Persio,
>
> You don't have to add IPSec. It is just Multipoint GRE without IPSec. It
> will definitely work.
>
> Regards,
>
> Tyson Scott - CCIE #13513 R&S, Security, and SP
> Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc.
> Mailto: tscott_at_ipexpert.com
> Telephone: +1.810.326.1444, ext. 208
> Live Assistance, Please visit: www.ipexpert.com/chat
> eFax: +1.810.454.0130
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody_at_groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> Persio Pucci
> Sent: Thursday, January 28, 2010 10:22 AM
> To: ccielab_at_groupstudy.com
> Subject: Re: OT: Dynamic GRE? (or secureless DMVPN)
>
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > I am wondering if is there any way to establish a GRE tunnel between two
> > sites, being that one of the ends has a dynamic IP address (backup) that
> > changes over time. I've considered DMVPN+NHRP but did not want to add the
> > IPsec overhead to it.
> >
> > Any input is appreciated!
> >
> > Persio
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Thu Jan 28 2010 - 13:52:58 ART

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu Feb 04 2010 - 20:28:42 ART