Re: IPv6 P-to-P Address allocation

 The latest BCP seems to be to use a /126.

B

Scott Morris, CCIEx4 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/Service Provider) #4713,

JNCIE-M #153, JNCIS-ER, CISSP, et al.

JNCI-M, JNCI-ER

evil_at_ine.com

Internetwork Expert, Inc.

http://www.InternetworkExpert.com

Toll Free: 877-224-8987

Outside US: 775-826-4344

Knowledge is power.

Power corrupts.

Study hard and be Eeeeviiiil......

ccieking_at_gmail.com wrote:

  Hello Experts,
  I would like to welcome your guidance about the IPv6 address allocation in
  point-to-point link.
  After reading RFC3627 bUse of /127 Prefix Length between Routers Considered
  Harmfulb ----
  Which is the best method for addressing in a Point-to-Point IPv6 link?
  Using /64 prefix waste lot of addresses and seem ugly.
  Any best real life scenario?
  Advance thanks.....
  Li

  Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
  _______________________________________________________________________
  Subscription information may be found at: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Wed Jan 27 2010 - 00:02:04 ART