Re: Sp OEQ

From: Dayaa Al Zoubi <cciecool_at_gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 13:50:16 +0400

> Hi all
>
> Since I posed my feedback I have received many private emails, you know I
> have my exam soon can you share !!!!  What do you recommend !!! , what
> is the new and old tech is .. ETC
>
> One thing you guys have to keep in mind , you will never have same
> questions and please do not believe if anyone trying to sell you a quick
fix
> for this .
>
> Frankly speaking after I have experienced this , I wished Cisco adopted
> this approach from day one of releasing the CCIE
>
> Yes I had one month to prepare which was not enough at all, but I was able
> to review a lot of materials which I found that I really forgot and it been
> a long time
>
> Now based my experience, only reading and understanding the tech in deep
> will help you .
>
> I am reviewing the following book a gain , please treat this as a list we
> can all build together and update a feedback .
>
> Book List to read and please do not try to visit the SP CCIE lab without
> deep understanding those books as a minimum requirement and you still
> need a good luck
>
> Those are the books I am considering to read before trying again , plz let
> me know if anyone would add another well written material and lets build
> a reading list which for sure will be the only way to pass the OEQ
>
> 1. TCP vol 1 and 2 (v.Good )
>
> 2. Mpls foundations (excellent )
>
> 3. MPLS Configuration on Cisco IOS Software
>
> 4. Isis cisco press book
>
> 5. Frame relay and ATM chapter in any book
>
> 6. Cisco. LAN Switching (v.Good )
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
> Dayaa
>
> CCIE R&S 21450
>
> On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 2:30 AM, Dayaa Al Zoubi <cciecool_at_gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Hi all
>>
>> i have posted this questions and now i am updating my experience ,
>> although i have failed because of the OEQ , but i can say it was
manageable
>> if you have a time to study , in my case it was introduced a month prior
to
>> my exam , i have focused on the new tech and then got 2 questions in the
new
>> tech which i answered and 2 old tech questions which i missed . so please
>> study all the blue print topics , READ , READ and READ
>>
>> it is worth 4 points only and if you fail / fail
>>
>> you can go back and front before the 30 min elapse or submit your
>> questions
>>
>> the remaining time you can invest in your lab
>>
>> thx
>>
>> dayaa
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 5:40 PM, Luan Nguyen
<luan_at_netcraftsmen.net>wrote:
>>
>>> I was hoping for a 21 points pass OEQs for the SP...but from what I
>>> heard,
>>> it's 4 points for pass and fail for fail.
>>>
>>> -Luan
>>>
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: nobody_at_groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
>>> Scott Morris
>>> Sent: Thursday, January 14, 2010 7:03 AM
>>> To: Nuno Reis
>>> Cc: Rick Mur; Anthony Fajri; ccielab_at_groupstudy.com
>>> Subject: Re: Sp OEQ
>>>
>>> In the v3 exam, the OEQs were worth 231 points. Back in October of last
>>> year, when the format changed to v4 this was completely rearranged as you
>>> noted there.
>>>
>>> Everyone SHOULD have been aware of this shift in points/requirements, as
>>> it was well documented throughout GS and CLN and other forums. I would
>>> hope that whatever bootcamp you took was back in the v3 blueprint. :)
>>>
>>> For OTHER tracks though, they are not on the same blueprint as R&S, so
>>> their point values (this thread was about SP) will more likely follow the
>>> old R&S v3 format.
>>>
>>> Scott
>>>
>>> Nuno Reis wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Rick,
>>>
>>> I did the RS exam this month and it was declared on the booklet that OEQ
>>> follows a FAIL/PASS grading, and if you pass you will get 4 points, if
>>> you
>>> fail, you fail the entire exam. You need to get 3 correct questions to
>>> pass
>>> and they will only show you the oeq performance if you fail, i.e 0%, 25%
>>> or
>>> 50%. If you get 75%, which means a passing grade, you will see 100%,
>>> regardless if you got 75% or 100%. Of course, you only see performance
>>> percentage if you fail the exam globally, otherwise the you see the
>>> sacred
>>> number.
>>> On the bootcamp I attented last year, the instructor also referred 21
>>> points given to oeq but that wasn't what I saw on the "torture chamber".
>>> If
>>> any upcoming candidate have the opportunity the invest a couple of
>>> minutes
>>> to explore the electronic booklet, may confirm what I just said.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Nuno
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: nobody_at_groupstudy.com [ mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com ] On
>>> Behalf Of Rick Mur
>>> Sent: Thursday, January 14, 2010 8:41 AM
>>> To: Anthony Fajri
>>> Cc: ccielab_at_groupstudy.com Subject: Re: Sp OEQ
>>>
>>> I don't know what you mean about the material but ut will have the same
>>> concept as the R&S has. 21 points for OEQ and 79 for the configuration.
>>> You
>>> will not have access to the documentation and you can't consult the
>>> proctor
>>> for clarification.
>>>
>>> The questions are based on the current blueprint topics so that's where
>>> you
>>> will have questions on. They can be theory based or they can give you a
>>> topology and ask for something.
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Rick Mur
>>> CCIE2 #21946 (R&S / Service Provider)
>>> Sr. Support Engineer IPexpert, Inc.
>>> URL: http://www.IPexpert.com <http://www.ipexpert.com/>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 4:18 AM, Anthony Fajri <fajri_at_freebsd.or.id>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi GS,
>>>
>>> any feedback on SP OeQ?
>>> is it 21 score concept as on RS?
>>> what about the material? is it text book material or hands on
>>> material?
>>>
>>> thanks and regards,
>>>
>>> -----
>>> Anthony Fajri http://fajri.freebsd.or.id
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 1:30 AM, JR Garcia <ttuner_at_gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> id be interested in hearing any feedback as well.
>>> im not scheduled for another few months out.
>>>
>>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________________________________
>>> Subscription information may be found at:
>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>>
>>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________________________________
>>> Subscription information may be found at:
>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>>
>>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>> _______________________________________________________________________
>>> Subscription information may be found at:
>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>>
>>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>> _______________________________________________________________________
>>> Subscription information may be found at:
>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>>
>>>
>>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________________________________
>>> Subscription information may be found at:
>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
>>> signature
>>> database 4770 (20100114) __________
>>>
>>> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
>>>
>>> http://www.eset.com
>>>
>>>
>>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________________________________
>>> Subscription information may be found at:
>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Tue Jan 26 2010 - 13:50:16 ART

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu Feb 04 2010 - 20:28:42 ART