Re: Re: VLAN 1002 -1005

okay.! ty!

On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 12:19 AM, Ryan West <rwest_at_zyedge.com> wrote:

> Divin,
>
> It will not work. Port itself appears up but int switchport reports port
> as inactive:
>
> Rack1SW1(config-if-range)#swi a v 1004
> % Warning: port will be inactive in non-ethernet VLAN
> % Warning: port will be inactive in non-ethernet VLAN
> Rack1SW1(config-if-range)#do show int f0/1 swi | i 1004
> Access Mode VLAN: 1004 (Inactive)
> Rack1SW1(config-if-range)#swi a v 1005
> % Warning: port will be inactive in non-ethernet VLAN
> % Warning: port will be inactive in non-ethernet VLAN
> Rack1SW1(config-if-range)#do show int f0/1 swi | i 1004
> Rack1SW1(config-if-range)#do show int f0/1 swi | i 1005
> Access Mode VLAN: 1005 (Inactive)
>
> Typical IP packet debugs occur for this type of traffic as well..
>
> *Dec 16 11:05:36.436: IP: tableid=0, s=155.1.146.3 (local), d=155.1.146.1
> (FastEthernet0/0), routed via RIB
> *Dec 16 11:05:36.436: IP: s=155.1.146.3 (local), d=155.1.146.1
> (FastEthernet0/0), len 100, sending
> *Dec 16 11:05:36.436: IP: s=155.1.146.3 (local), d=155.1.146.1
> (FastEthernet0/0), len 100, encapsulation failed
>
> -ryan
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: nobody_at_groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> > Divin Mathew John
> > Sent: Friday, January 22, 2010 1:41 PM
> > To: armylegionmedic_at_aol.com
> > Cc: bbartik_at_ipexpert.com; anthonize_at_gmail.com; ccielab_at_groupstudy.com
> > Subject: Re: Re: VLAN 1002 -1005
> >
> > Yeah that was the question!
> >
>

-- 
Sent from Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net