Re: Is there a methodical way to check full reachability?

R1--- r2--- R3

R1 thinks R2 is next hop for R3 Lo0. and R2 Thinks R1 is next hop for R3'
Lo0

On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 10:27 PM, Carlos G Mendioroz <tron_at_huapi.ba.ar>wrote:

> Would you please show a simple example where you have routes and
> not reachability ? Obviously without ACLs blocking traffic.
>
> -Carlos
>
> Marko Milivojevic @ 22/01/2010 8:54 -0300 dixit:
> > On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 23:51, Carlos G Mendioroz <tron_at_huapi.ba.ar>
> wrote:
> >> Or you can use the thoughtfull (sp?) way of verifying that all your
> >> networks have indeed routes in all your routers, and that you have
> >> no routing (change) activity (i.e. debug routing).
> >
> > Having routes in the routing table does not mean reachability :-).
> >
> > Having pings working, doesn't mean full routing convergence :-).
> >
> > --
> > Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427
> > Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert
> >
> > Mailto: markom_at_ipexpert.com
> > Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
> > Fax: +1.810.454.0130
> > Community: http://www.ipexpert.com/communities
>
> --
> Carlos G Mendioroz <tron_at_huapi.ba.ar> LW7 EQI Argentina
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

-- 
Sent from Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net