Re: Featured Article: GET protected DMVPN

From: <armylegionmedic_at_aol.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2010 18:18:27 -0500

I believe he is meaning NEWER, which GET VPN is. The first time I ever seen
Cisco really talking about this and promoting it was at this last Cisco
Networkers 2009. Prior to that if they had it, it wasnt advertised, promoted,
or deployed much. According the the 8 hour Sunday course I took, it was really
new and they are still trying to push it into the market.

Regards,

James

-----Original Message-----
From: mohammed shoeb ahmed <mdshoeb_at_gmail.com>
To: Ken Denube <kd5262_at_gmail.com>
Cc: Cisco certification <security_at_groupstudy.com>; Cisco certification
<ccielab_at_groupstudy.com>
Sent: Tue, Jan 19, 2010 3:14 pm
Subject: Re: FW: Featured Article: GET protected DMVPN

Thanks Ken for sharing, but GET is not new it is in implementation since 1
ear at my premises over an MPLS cloud.Currently am also working on moving
MVPN over GET VPN.

--
est Regards,
Mohammed Shoeb Ahmed
Sr. Consultant,
CIE 18379
logs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Tue Jan 19 2010 - 18:18:27 ART

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu Feb 04 2010 - 20:28:41 ART