Re: VRF - Problem

From: Wouter Prins <wp_at_null0.nl>
Date: Sun, 17 Jan 2010 13:18:31 +0100

Hi,

That looks good, but why did you setup bgp on the P router? Testing
purposes? You said that it works when you setup bgp between the two PE's.
This is exactly the way you want to do it with an MPLS topology.
With MPLS you dont need to setup bgp on P routers, so it can use the MPLS
labels for switching. (Which is why MPLS is so great after all)

HTH,
Wouter

On 17 January 2010 12:06, CCIE-Newbie <ccie_ka_at_gmx.de> wrote:

> Hi Wouter,
>
> here is the output:
>
>
> sh ip bgp neighbors 3.3.3.3 | i advert
> Route refresh: advertised and received(old & new)
> Address family IPv4 Unicast: advertised and received
> Address family VPNv4 Unicast: advertised and received
> Default minimum time between advertisement runs is 0 seconds
>
>
> This seems to be ok ?!
>
> Dennis
>
> Thans
>
> Am Sonntag, den 17.01.2010, 11:03 +0100 schrieb Wouter Prins:
> > VPNv4 AFI
>
>

-- 
Wouter Prins
wp_at_null0.nl
CCIE #25628
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Sun Jan 17 2010 - 13:18:31 ART

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu Feb 04 2010 - 20:28:41 ART