Swap:
Thanks for sharing your experience with the group. I'm sure that many will
benefit from this information.
-- Thanks Larry Hadrava CCIE #12203 Check Out MyBlog: http://ccie12203.wordpress.com/ On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 3:13 PM, swap m <ccie19804_at_gmail.com> wrote: > time for feedback..i'll keep everything under the NDA.. - > > i got screwed on 2 things - > > 1. OEQs!! > 2. oblivious miscalculation of time and the great proctor > > oeqs were too much ..one was too ambigious, there cant be a correct answer > for tht without more clarification. the proctor had no clue, he is anyway > not supposed to assist in the oeqs. another oeq isnt a thing to be found in > books, atleast not in the 5-6 books i have read on tht topic. after srching > more, i found a reference in the RFC with no reasoning. i'll hv to test and > do an analysis on it some time later once i chill down. > only one oeq was directly technically related to the lab, rest all were > purely theory which have nothing to do with configuration. > > > now the lab.. > the cisco ccie webpage says lab timing 815am to 545 pm....i never bothered > to count the hours for this range..this totals as 9.5 hrs..always had an > illusion tht its 8.5hrs including the lunch...a silly mirage..the exam > started late, so i added the late hours thinking the lab will be over > around > 645pm..infact the others doing the lab did the same miscalculation and we > had a cogent discussion on this thing in the lunch time! > > lab was pretty difficult comparing it to any of the vendor > mocklabs..atleast > an 8.5 to 9 on IEWB scale.. too much stuff in the lab but i was very well > prepared to beat it. the difficult part mostly went smooth other than basic > issues. my lab was over in total 5.5hrs (including the oeq time) with > 5-points in one subsection not wrking. i kept doing all my RnD/doc > cd/multiple restarts etc. no help. i left it after trying for around 1.5 > hrs. silly me still thinking tht i have 2 hrs left while in reality i had > only 1 hr left...did the reverification very slowly, kept correcting..and > moving forward..found many basic missouts, corrected, and all was wrking > flawless, word-by-word as per the instructions..2 sections were left to be > verified when the proctor came for a final stop..i still thought i have > atleast an hour left! ...he simply closed all the my console sessions > without letting me even do the write mem! i asked for a minute to just do > wr > mem but the answer was a blunt no. fair on his part, foolish on mine. > > game over. > > bad score in oeq, and an ok score in the lab. i dont even remember at wht > stage i saved the config on which device. relating the scores to the > configuration save, i missed out some of the late config changes for which > i > lost point the labs. i'm sure now tht SP rack is reloaded before grading, > atleast for me it ws done tht way. > > > learning of the day - i covered a hell lot of stuff for the OEQs but it > fall > short in the end..and honestly i dont see much improvement in future > attempts for oeq preparation..after one stage, u feel comfortable with > theory but a lot of luck is needed especially for the ambiguous ones....the > intent of oeqs shud be configuration related as the ccie-written is already > focusing on theory but unfortunately tht's not the case.....for the lab > part, my current level was pretty much sufficient for the clearing the lab, > hope i can maintain the same standard for the next attempt... > > thanks for the wonderful group...together we win > > big best of luck to everyone gng for the lab and the awful oeqs. > > Swap > #19804 > > > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net > > _______________________________________________________________________ > Subscription information may be found at: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.netReceived on Wed Jan 13 2010 - 15:31:34 ART
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu Feb 04 2010 - 20:28:41 ART