Re: split horizon

From: jack daniels <jckdaniels12_at_gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 09:30:46 +0530

Hi BOBOLA OKE,

I'm trying clear my fundamentals only .....Tihs is the Q that poped in my
mind.
Regarding HSRP ACTIVE/ACTIVE I was being asked by custoomer who was sure abt
it, so I asked this .

I'm always open to learn technologies and hear abt my shortcomings. Same I'm
doing same also by asking Q. I think SAYING THIS AGAIN and AGAIN TYPICAL
"Jack Daniels" question , is not required. If don't think there is nothing
to BOST abt technologies which are already being written (RFC) ...
You need to understand that there are some Q you face in field when you face
customer and that is diffucult part than reding cisco Links.

Thousands of candles can be lit from a single candle, and the life of the
candle will not be shortened.

Regards
JACK DANIELS

On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 3:03 AM, Bobola Oke <okebobola_at_gmail.com> wrote:

> I have to say this is a typical "Jack Daniels" question.
>
> I think you have a "fundamental misunderstanding" of routing protocols as
> sp-ie m pointed out yesterday. Here is what he said:
>
> *"i wud rather recommend you to first revise the RnS stuff for which Cisco
> manifests you as "expert".
>
> No offense but questions like "does HSRP support active/active" and "does
> pix run BGP" from a CCIE is least expected.
> i'm a regular silent follower of the group, and most of the time just by
> looking at the subject i'm able to guess this question must have come from
> "jack daniels".
>
> first bring urself to an expert level instead of getting the "double"
> tag....else it wud be more insulting for you to ask your type questions
> after the double tag...
>
> BTW SP has OEQs now, it wud be tough nuts to crack for you even you managed
> to get thru RnS before otherwise..
>
> the mail might sound offensive but the intent is to see a justification
> against the "ccie" tag...ordinary ccie is worse than a just a ccna!"*
>
>
> Take his advice and revise ccie r&s before jumping to ccie sp
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 10:15 PM, Manu Ohri (mohri) <mohri_at_cisco.com>wrote:
>
>> NO SPLIT Horizon for OSPF , it comes in picture only on distance vector
>> based protocols
>> You have config issues.
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: nobody_at_groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
>> jack daniels
>> Sent: Tuesday, January 05, 2010 10:01 AM
>> To: Cisco certification
>> Subject: split horizon
>>
>> Hi guys,
>>
>> I have a scenario where in MPLS VPN - HUB and SPOKE.
>>
>> CE-PE protocol is OSPF everywhere
>>
>>
>> HUB is recieving routes from one SPOKE on int G0/1 and not advertiseing
>> on same (SPLIT horizon).
>>
>> In ospf how can we overcome such issue.
>>
>> Regards
>>
>>
>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>
>>
>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Wed Jan 06 2010 - 09:30:46 ART

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu Feb 04 2010 - 20:28:41 ART