RE: Remote phone control

The berbee one is a definitely slow...I know we have a really nice Cisco
proprietary one that we use in the Cisco 360 Voice classes... and I
believe Adel might have something to do with that? :)

thanks,
Brad Ellis
CCIE#5796 (R&S / Security)
CCSI# 30482
CEO / President
CCBOOTCAMP - Cisco Learning Solutions Partner (CLSP)
Email: brad_at_ccbootcamp.com
Toll Free: 877-654-2243
International: +1-702-968-5100
Skype: skype:ccbootcamp?call
FAX: +1-702-446-8012
YES! We take Cisco Learning Credits!
Training And Remote Racks: http://www.ccbootcamp.com

-----Original Message-----
From: nobody_at_groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Adel Abouchaev
Sent: Monday, January 04, 2010 8:58 AM
To: 'Cisco certification'
Subject: RE: Remote phone control

Berbee remote control is still slow when talking to 7965, a single
screenshot size of that phone is 250Kb. Whilst you can still do calls
and
answers well, the conferencing and other interactive parts aren't easy.
And
there is no voice feedback.

Adel.

-----Original Message-----
From: nobody_at_groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Hough, Earl
Sent: Monday, January 04, 2010 6:55 AM
To: Ryan West; Iwan Hoogendoorn; Radioactive Frog
Cc: CCIE; groupstudy
Subject: RE: Remote phone control

Not sure exactly when this switch changed. But, at this point
Singlewire
owns all the software (RPC, Informacast, etc) which was formerly Berbee,
then owned by CDW.

Earl Hough CCIE #16508 (R&S/Security)

-----Original Message-----
From: Ryan West [mailto:rwest_at_zyedge.com]
Sent: Monday, January 04, 2010 9:52 AM
To: Hough, Earl; Iwan Hoogendoorn; Radioactive Frog
Cc: CCIE; groupstudy
Subject: RE: Remote phone control

Earl,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody_at_groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com] On Behalf
Of
> Hough, Earl
> Sent: Monday, January 04, 2010 9:41 AM
> Subject: RE: Remote phone control
>
> It is now owned by Singlewire. www.singlewire.com
>
> Earl Hough CCIE #16508 (R&S/Security)
> inute movie at: movie.sarcom.com
>

Any idea when this changed? I guess it makes sense for CDW to not have
a
software line of its own. Maybe they figured they were making enough
money
being a gold partner and a distributor at the same time :)

-ryan
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
_

The information contained in this transmission is confidential. It is
intended solely for the use of the individual(s) or organization(s) to
whom it is addressed. Any disclosure, copying or further distribution is
not permitted unless such privilege is explicitly granted in writing by
SARCOM, Inc. Furthermore, SARCOM, Inc. is not responsible for
the proper and complete transmission of the substance of this
communication, nor for any delay in its receipt.

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Mon Jan 04 2010 - 15:07:37 ART