RE: Injecting loopback

    3

-----Original Message-----
From: Rick Mur <rmur_at_ipexpert.com>
Sent: January 03, 2010 9:38
To: Nuno Reis <nreis_at_regra.pt>
Cc: ccielab_at_groupstudy.com <ccielab_at_groupstudy.com>
Subject: Re: Injecting loopback

Definitely not, it's the right approach.
It's the only way to get the loopback addresses to be an internal address, if that is a task requirement.

If it's not and it's not specifically asked in a question to inject the loopback, but you do have a full reach ability requirement, I would use redistribute connected with a route-map matching all interfaces that are not in a routing protocol yet.

-- 
Regards,
Rick Mur
CCIE2 #21946 (R&S / Service Provider)
Sr. Support Engineer  IPexpert, Inc.
URL: http://www.IPexpert.com
On 3 jan 2010, at 15:26, Nuno Reis wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> To fix a routing issue on my lab, on one router, I injected the loopback
> address on two routing protocols at the same time to be seen as internal on
> two different routing domains. Is it a wrong approach?
> 
> Thanks,
> NR
> 
> 
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> 
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at: 
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net