Definitely not, it's the right approach.
It's the only way to get the loopback addresses to be an internal address, if that is a task requirement.
If it's not and it's not specifically asked in a question to inject the loopback, but you do have a full reach ability requirement, I would use redistribute connected with a route-map matching all interfaces that are not in a routing protocol yet.
-- Regards, Rick Mur CCIE2 #21946 (R&S / Service Provider) Sr. Support Engineer IPexpert, Inc. URL: http://www.IPexpert.com On 3 jan 2010, at 15:26, Nuno Reis wrote: > Hi, > > To fix a routing issue on my lab, on one router, I injected the loopback > address on two routing protocols at the same time to be seen as internal on > two different routing domains. Is it a wrong approach? > > Thanks, > NR > > > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net > > _______________________________________________________________________ > Subscription information may be found at: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.netReceived on Sun Jan 03 2010 - 15:38:41 ART
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu Feb 04 2010 - 20:28:41 ART