Well that's different. For one your traffic pattern's probably won't grow
that large. I'm still not sure I understand exactly why you need full
tables though. For example your other ISP could only advertise you the
routes you need. You could also allow them to send you the full table and
filter so if you want more all you have to do is update your filters. I
wonder if any carriers are willing to do ORF? I guess it's moot though.
When I referred to bw and throughput running out I was talking about
growth. There is enough memory to support the full table and growth so
the ceiling the original poster should be worried about is the circuit or
LAN throughput since the 3800/3900 are mainly DS3 routers.
From:
Rick Mur <rmur_at_ipexpert.com>
To:
"<Keegan.Holley_at_sungard.com>" <Keegan.Holley_at_sungard.com>
Cc:
"ccielab_at_groupstudy.com" <ccielab_at_groupstudy.com>, "mzsaeed_at_gmail.com"
<mzsaeed_at_gmail.com>, nobody_at_groupstudy.com, Ryan West <rwest_at_zyedge.com>
Date:
12/23/2009 03:04 AM
Subject:
Re: OT-How many IPV4 routes Cisco 3900 can handle?
Sent by:
<nobody_at_groupstudy.com>
Redundant ISP connection and I want to route traffic to a couple specific
AS
numbers out the other link (for remote management purposes).
-- Regards, Rick Mur CCIE2 #21946 (R&S / Service Provider) Sr. Support Engineer IPexpert, Inc. URL: http://www.IPexpert.com On 23 dec 2009, at 03:58, <Keegan.Holley_at_sungard.com> <Keegan.Holley_at_sungard.com> wrote: > > What are you using it for? More importantly why does it have the full table? I worked at a company that did this on a 2600XM with a single T1 just to keep an ISP from reclaiming routes. > > > > From: Rick Mur <rmur_at_ipexpert.com> > To: <Keegan.Holley_at_sungard.com> > Cc: Ryan West <rwest_at_zyedge.com>, "ccielab_at_groupstudy.com" <ccielab_at_groupstudy.com>, "mzsaeed_at_gmail.com" <mzsaeed_at_gmail.com>, nobody_at_groupstudy.com > Date: 12/22/2009 02:44 AM > Subject: Re: OT-How many IPV4 routes Cisco 3900 can handle? > Sent by: <nobody_at_groupstudy.com> > > > > > Why's that? I'm running a 2811 here with full BGP table and I still have all the forwarding I need. The CPU would not be affected that much by enabling BGP, only during convergence it is (for a couple minutes that is :-) > > > -- > Regards, > > Rick Mur > CCIE2 #21946 (R&S / Service Provider) > Sr. Support Engineer IPexpert, Inc. > URL: http://www.IPexpert.com > > On 22 dec 2009, at 03:43, <Keegan.Holley_at_sungard.com> <Keegan.Holley_at_sungard.com> wrote: > > > You probably would hit forwarding/bandwidth limits before you hit routing > > table limits. > > > > > > > > > > From: > > Ryan West <rwest_at_zyedge.com> > > To: > > "mzsaeed_at_gmail.com" <mzsaeed_at_gmail.com>, "ccielab_at_groupstudy.com" > > <ccielab_at_groupstudy.com> > > Date: > > 12/21/2009 05:24 PM > > Subject: > > RE: OT-How many IPV4 routes Cisco 3900 can handle? > > Sent by: > > <nobody_at_groupstudy.com> > > > > > > > > This a memory consideration. Since the default memory for the 39xx is > > 1GB, it will handle a full Internet feed of 300,000+ routes. > > > > -ryan > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: nobody_at_groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of > >> mzsaeed_at_gmail.com > >> Sent: Monday, December 21, 2009 5:07 PM > >> To: ccielab_at_groupstudy.com > >> Subject: OT-How many IPV4 routes Cisco 3900 can handle? > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> Need help to verify if Cisco 3900 can handle more that 40,000 IPV4 > >> routes in > >> its BGP table? > >> > >> > >> Thanks, > >> > >> Mohammad Saeed > >> > >> > >> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net > >> > >>Received on Wed Dec 23 2009 - 06:55:15 ART
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sat Jan 02 2010 - 11:11:08 ART