Re: OT: SP workbooks

From: Cisco League <ciscoleague_at_googlemail.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 14:41:36 +0000

Narbik was going to launch SP workbooks. May be worth waiting for.

On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 1:47 PM, Gaurav Thukral <pearlgaurav_at_gmail.com>wrote:

> Hi Guys,
>
> I Know that INE have not updated the Workbook from a long time. So you can
> use IPexpert & Iementor Tech labs for Technology understanding and INE &
> IPexpert labs for Major Labs. That is the best solution.
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 6:57 PM, backbone systems <
> backbone.systems_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > INE SP workbooks are not that great.....the problem is that they have
> > not updated them for long time.....try comparing the outline of INE
> > with Antonio's blueprint and u will come to know how much they are
> > missing.....i hope the r working on the updates....bc on rest of the
> > tracks they are really doing fine......CoDs from IE are definitely
> > perfect...A must for SP.....
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 1:40 PM, Alexei Monastyrnyi <alexeim73_at_gmail.com
> >
> > wrote:
> > > Guys and Gals,
> > > I am thinking of buying a vendor workbook set for SP track and
> > contemplating
> > > IPX vs INE. The reason for other vendors to be left alone for now is
> > > technology workbook I am interested in along with full-labs.
> > >
> > > Price-wise it is more beneficial to buy INE set, one gets two workbooks
> > (Vol
> > > 1 and Vol 2), plus Dynamips version for full-lab one plus Technology
> CoD,
> > > with recent promotion it is under 500 USD.
> > >
> > > IPX has end-of-year promotion for two workbooks (Vol 1 with 25 focus
> labs
> > > and Vol 2 with 10 full labs) for exactly 500 USD, this promotion is not
> > on
> > > the web. Dynamips topologies are also available from IPX if I remember
> > > right.
> > >
> > > So the Q is about quality. IPX claims they have an updated set of SP
> > > workbooks comparing to those ppl would use several months ago. I have
> > also
> > > heard some feedbacks mentioning INE workbooks are sometimes erroneous
> and
> > > little has been done to fix this over the last year or so. The benefit
> of
> > > INE is obviously CoD included in the set.
> > >
> > > I just wanted to hear you opinions guys, sorry if it disrupts your
> > studies.
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > A.
> > >
> > >
> > > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________________________________
> > > Subscription information may be found at:
> > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
> >
> > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Regards,
>
> Gaurav Thukral
> CCIE#21156( R&S), CCIE SP (Q)
> CCIP, CCDP, CCNA
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Mon Dec 14 2009 - 14:41:36 ART

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sat Jan 02 2010 - 11:11:08 ART