Re: OT: Cisco and Foundry LACP

Guys thanks for your inputs,

This is exactly what is happening. Its working only one way - Cisco to
Foundry but not Foundry to Cisco.The guy who think he know foundry has
enabled "TRUNK" on first 3 ports on Foundry and LACP is disabled on the
foundry.

This is what worrying part is without LACP or any cloubbing protocol how it
can do load balance among all other ports?

Howard - per packet based load balancing is only one way as mentioned
above. Foundry to cisco traffic is not getting load-balanced.

-Kermit

On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 1:48 AM, Scott Morris <smorris_at_ine.com> wrote:

> So you're saying that static would only occur on one side? You can't
> have balanced static? Or is it if you only have static on one channel
> that it IS balanced? :)
>
>
>
>
> Tony Varriale wrote:
> > Well if the etherchannel is all static-y, I would say yes :)
> >
> > tv
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: nobody_at_groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> > Scott Morris
> > Sent: Thursday, December 10, 2009 8:30 AM
> > To: Radioactive Frog
> > Cc: Danshtr; Cisco certification
> > Subject: Re: OT: Cisco and Foundry LACP
> >
> > Are you saying that with a static etherchannel, you get no load
> > balancing? ;)
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > *Scott Morris*, CCIE/x4/ (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/Service Provider) #4713,
> >
> > JNCIE-M #153, JNCIS-ER, CISSP, et al.
> >
> > JNCI-M, JNCI-ER
> >
> > evil_at_ine.com
> >
> >
> > Internetwork Expert, Inc.
> >
> > http://www.InternetworkExpert.com
> >
> > Toll Free: 877-224-8987
> >
> > Outside US: 775-826-4344
> >
> >
> > Knowledge is power.
> >
> > Power corrupts.
> >
> > Study hard and be Eeeeviiiil......
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Radioactive Frog wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Dan,
> >> Understand but without any LACP or PAGP we can not load balance.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Link_Aggregation_Control_Protocol#Link_Aggregat
> > ion_Control_Protocol
> >
> >> </kermit>
> >>
> >> On 12/10/09, Danshtr <danshtr_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>> Kermit,
> >>>
> >>> I have no experience with Foundry, but LACP is not about load-balancing
> >>> inside the etherchannel. LACP is about forming etherchannels.
> >>>
> >>> HTH,
> >>> Dan #13685(RS/Sec/SP)
> >>> Troubleshooting blog: http://dans-net.com
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 3:33 PM, Radioactive Frog
> >>> <pbhatkoti_at_gmail.com>wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> Does anyone has experience with Foundry ether-channel (src-dst-ip)
> >>>> load balancing?
> >>>> according to the foundry manual, it says just trunk the ports and no
> >>>> need to enable LACP. without LACp how does it do the load balancing
> >>>> with Cisco?
> >>>>
> >>>> Cisco-sw====3 ports====foundry-sw
> >>>>
> >>>> thanks
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >>>>
> >>>>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> >>>> Subscription information may be found at:
> >>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________________________________
> >> Subscription information may be found at:
> >> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >>
> >
> >
> > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
> >
> > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Fri Dec 11 2009 - 09:42:33 ART