Re: OT: Cisco and Foundry LACP

Are you saying that with a static etherchannel, you get no load
balancing? ;)

*Scott Morris*, CCIE/x4/ (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/Service Provider) #4713,

JNCIE-M #153, JNCIS-ER, CISSP, et al.

JNCI-M, JNCI-ER

evil_at_ine.com

Internetwork Expert, Inc.

http://www.InternetworkExpert.com

Toll Free: 877-224-8987

Outside US: 775-826-4344

Knowledge is power.

Power corrupts.

Study hard and be Eeeeviiiil......

Radioactive Frog wrote:
> Hi Dan,
> Understand but without any LACP or PAGP we can not load balance.
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Link_Aggregation_Control_Protocol#Link_Aggregation_Control_Protocol
>
> </kermit>
>
> On 12/10/09, Danshtr <danshtr_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Kermit,
>>
>> I have no experience with Foundry, but LACP is not about load-balancing
>> inside the etherchannel. LACP is about forming etherchannels.
>>
>> HTH,
>> Dan #13685(RS/Sec/SP)
>> Troubleshooting blog: http://dans-net.com
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 3:33 PM, Radioactive Frog
>> <pbhatkoti_at_gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Does anyone has experience with Foundry ether-channel (src-dst-ip)
>>> load balancing?
>>> according to the foundry manual, it says just trunk the ports and no
>>> need to enable LACP. without LACp how does it do the load balancing
>>> with Cisco?
>>>
>>> Cisco-sw====3 ports====foundry-sw
>>>
>>> thanks
>>>
>>>
>>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________________________________
>>> Subscription information may be found at:
>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>>
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Thu Dec 10 2009 - 09:30:22 ART